| Revision as of 13:29, 2 November 2018 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →Notice of discretionary sanctions: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:44, 2 November 2018 edit undoLittleolive oil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,079 edits →Edit war warning: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC) | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| *Oh Jytdog for heaven's sake. You reverted me...YOU BEGAN EDIT WARRING... and I reverted to adjust to your comments on the source-to be able to repair the content. One at least, of the sources does comment on protoscience and transcience. I don't have the first source so cannot affirm whether the content is accurate or not per that source. Unless you have that source your edit summary may be false. You also could have adjusted the stable content in the article so slightly to make the source accurate but instead you reverted and decided to edit war. I am an experienced editor and my edits we logical and an attempt to create accuracy in the stable version of this article so this tag is an attempt to harass and you know it. Too bad.(] (]) 13:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)) | |||
| == Notice of discretionary sanctions == | == Notice of discretionary sanctions == | ||
Revision as of 13:44, 2 November 2018
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
WP:RETENTION
This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.
 Archives | ||||||
Index
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
GOCE March drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update
  Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
test
GOCE February blitz wrapup
Guild of Copy Editors Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2014 wrap-up
Participation: Out of seven people who signed up for this blitz, all copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 16 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by |
Met releases images/ Note to self
http://www.nbcnews.com/slideshow/met-digitizes-its-collection-releasing-350-00-images-free-n719661
August GOCE newsletter
| Guild of Copy Editors August 2018 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the August 2018 GOCE newsletter. Thanks to everyone who participated in the Guild's June election; your new and returning coordinators are listed below. The next election will occur in December 2018; all Misplaced Pages editors in good standing may take part.  Our June blitz focused on Requests and articles tagged for copy edit in October 2017. Of the eleven people who signed up, eight editors recorded a total of 28 copy edits, including 3 articles of more than 10,000 words. Complete results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Thanks to everyone who participated in the July drive. Of the seventeen people who signed up, thirteen editors completed 194 copy edits, successfully removing all articles tagged in the last three months of 2017. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are here. The August blitz will run for one week, from 19 to 25 August. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Tdslk. >>> Sign up for the August blitz! <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sofia Airport
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sofia Airport. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Shortcut
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Shortcut. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Edit war warning
Your note here expresses a clear intention to edit war.
Your recent editing history at Ayurveda shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oh Jytdog for heaven's sake. You reverted me...YOU BEGAN EDIT WARRING... and I reverted to adjust to your comments on the source-to be able to repair the content. One at least, of the sources does comment on protoscience and transcience. I don't have the first source so cannot affirm whether the content is accurate or not per that source. Unless you have that source your edit summary may be false. You also could have adjusted the stable content in the article so slightly to make the source accurate but instead you reverted and decided to edit war. I am an experienced editor and my edits we logical and an attempt to create accuracy in the stable version of this article so this tag is an attempt to harass and you know it. Too bad.(Littleolive oil (talk) 13:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC))
Notice of discretionary sanctions
Refreshing this, as it has been more than a year.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.