| Revision as of 20:05, 9 November 2006 editNehwyn (talk | contribs)6,884 edits 3RR notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:15, 9 November 2006 edit undoDr mindbender (talk | contribs)1,284 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :] 09:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | :] 09:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Above and to the right is the de facto standard, but there are some cases where another arrangement is more aescetically pleasing. I don't know enough about the subject to write the article, but if you are interested in doing web-based research, there are plenty of and hits for "Pontifex Maximus." Hope these help. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 17:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===RCC=== | |||
| I think the article is improved now, as I said on Lima's talk page, my concern is to use the word "apostacy" or similar serious religious term to describe what happens when someone leaves the Church. So long as this is done I will sign off. ] 17:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Apologies. I thought you were referring to people brought up as Anglicans, Lutherans, Presbyterians etc. etc. I conclude now that you were referring only to (ex-?)Catholics. The canon quoted dates only from 1983. There was a time when excommunication clearly meant exclusion from the Church, corresponding to a declaration of defection now, and the declaration need not be requested and may even be contested by the person concerned. Or do you think every woman who procures an abortion ceases immediately to be a member of the Church? ] 18:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RC in Orthodoxy == | |||
| Please stop removing the "Roman" from "Roman Catholic in ]. As the Orthodox Church also claims to be Catholic, this is an important disambiguation. ] 03:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Stop. If you continue removing important disambiguation, I will report you for vandalism. ] 03:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your edits to ]== | |||
| Hello there! Please, keep in mind that you have already reverted the ] article three times in the last 24 hours; a fourth revert would be a violation of the ]. The latter aims to encourage resolution of disagreements through discussion, rather than repeated reverts. Please, consider arguing your case on the article's talk page instead! --] 20:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:15, 9 November 2006
Thanks!
Hallo,
thanks a lot for correcting my article about Borgo! As native italian, my english is far for perfect. I hope that you enjoyed reading the article. Thanks again and ciao,
alex2006 06:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe the first, but for sure not the last one ;-)
- Thanks again!