| Revision as of 17:03, 8 November 2018 editE.M.Gregory (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users45,004 edits →Should this have a standalone article?: sigh← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:42, 16 November 2018 edit undoLevivich (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers40,440 edits →Should this have a standalone article?Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Why not throw this into ] or ] along with all the other phrases and slogans that got RS coverage but which don't really deserve standalone in-depth articles? ] (]) 22:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC) | Why not throw this into ] or ] along with all the other phrases and slogans that got RS coverage but which don't really deserve standalone in-depth articles? ] (]) 22:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :It's, like, useful to look at the page before commenting on it. If you have, you might have noticed that this was a slogan in the midterm, not in a Presidential campaign. More to the point, Politico, the New York Times and several other mainstream publications went INDEPTH on this slogan. Also, as you would have known if you had actually looked, ] is almost entirely bluelinked phrases. Next time, read before commenting.] (]) 17:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC) | :It's, like, useful to look at the page before commenting on it. If you have, you might have noticed that this was a slogan in the midterm, not in a Presidential campaign. More to the point, Politico, the New York Times and several other mainstream publications went INDEPTH on this slogan. Also, as you would have known if you had actually looked, ] is almost entirely bluelinked phrases. Next time, read before commenting.] (]) 17:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :Seems to me yes, it should be a standalone article. The sources establish notability. This particular slogan, as a slogan, received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. There's no reason ''not'' to have separate articles for notable political slogans. ] (]) 23:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:42, 16 November 2018
Should this have a standalone article?
Why not throw this into List of United States political catchphrases or List of U.S. presidential campaign slogans along with all the other phrases and slogans that got RS coverage but which don't really deserve standalone in-depth articles? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's, like, useful to look at the page before commenting on it. If you have, you might have noticed that this was a slogan in the midterm, not in a Presidential campaign. More to the point, Politico, the New York Times and several other mainstream publications went INDEPTH on this slogan. Also, as you would have known if you had actually looked, List of United States political catchphrases is almost entirely bluelinked phrases. Next time, read before commenting.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- Seems to me yes, it should be a standalone article. The sources establish notability. This particular slogan, as a slogan, received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. There's no reason not to have separate articles for notable political slogans. Levivich (talk) 23:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)