Revision as of 08:06, 4 December 2018 editSHRDLU SHRDLU SHRDLU (talk | contribs)11 edits →Worthy addition: presidential TV ads, also clarification of cases brought against him: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:17, 5 December 2018 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement/Archive 12) (botNext edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
== Fursov translation == | |||
Since there continues to be quarreling over the Fursov translation, I'll provide a link to the discussion at RefDesk. People should resist the temptation to "spin" what was said there: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Language/2014_January_10#Russian_translation ] (]) 04:56, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Note that Reference Desk editor Lüboslóv Yęzýkin said "I'm not sure that literal translation will do better." ] (]) 18:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Let us accept that it is RS as you insisted before. The correct translation is 180 degrees away from your initial translation. If it was RS before, it is still RS with the actual correct translation. Cheers. ] (]) 18:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::It was you who introduced the 180 degree mixup of "not the quality but the quantity" versus "not the quantity, but the quality." Also, I have never questioned whether Fursov is a reliable source. You were confused then and you are still confused now. ] (]) 18:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::No -- the claim about LaRouche specifically being "''insignificant''" per edits , , etc. and etc. Cheers. ] (]) 19:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified == | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060524102919/http://nacbez.ru:80/society/article.php?id=1644 to http://nacbez.ru/society/article.php?id=1644 | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} | |||
Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 14:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
== "La Rouche in federal prison" -- missing topic from Contents == | == "La Rouche in federal prison" -- missing topic from Contents == |
Revision as of 01:17, 5 December 2018
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
Untitled
- Draft and source pages
- Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche/sources
- Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche/Temp
- Talk:Political views of Lyndon LaRouche/Gays & AIDS
- Talk:Political views of Lyndon LaRouche/sandbox
- Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche/China Youth Daily
"La Rouche in federal prison" -- missing topic from Contents
https://en.wikipedia.org/LaRouche_criminal_trials#Later_developments la rouche's 5 yrs in fed prison
173.61.9.126 (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.insidehighered.com/views/mclemee/mclemee132
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=%2Farchive%2F1998%2F06%2F04%2Fndi104.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218141859/http://www2.timesreview.com/ST/Stories/T071609_Obama_ES to http://www2.timesreview.com/ST/Stories/T071609_Obama_ES
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://my.ojornal.com/sports-news/larouche-supporters-make-their-case-taunton-green-election-day
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Worthy addition: presidential TV ads, also clarification of cases brought against him
Ok, an asside first. Somewhere there’s mention in f the tri-part test actually 4parts6for libel of a public figure being reffered to as the LaRouche Tesr, not true - it is the SCOTUS decision in Sullivan v NY Times: In a case regarding a public figure, 1) truth beats all 2) the figure must be identifiable (usually 1is assumed - you can say or print just about anything about anyone if it true) 2) Southern Sheriffs Sullivan claimed an NAACP ad in the NYT was about him(can’t find ny casebook, please check old guy ‘s memory - ad, about injustice against blacks, civ rights workers etc.) didn’t even single out a state 3) absence of legal malice: a) plaintiff must prove respondent had no data or respondent can demonstrate it had information it reasonabley believed true and b) respondent made an effort to test accuracy of data. I doubr any country rt decision would ever be given LL’s nane! And please cite case - not te there was also bad precedent set during NJ v Mario Jascalavich trial - the curari killer who got awaw when NYT reporter Myron Farber refused to reveal sources on story about the investigation of “Dr. X” - there was some law established, later demolished by “shield laws” in almost all 50 states making it near impossible for newspapers to be forced to reveal names of anonymous sources. Of course by that time Farber had been imprisoned for contempt of court by a damned fool Bergen Co. NJ judge, and rhe sideshow, which really didn’t effect state’s case against Dr Death had led to Jascalavich cleared and moving to Argentina, where he died, must be 35 years ago now.
Also NB: or should that be N Morte: I find it hard to believe LL is still alive in his late 90s+ this may be simple lar to the rather suspicious death date given by Scientology Inc.’s house doctor for former SF writer turned creator of a religion “because thats where the money is” say many who heard him discussing plan to turn novel into Dianetics, the wealthy , er, religion’s Bible, a rewrite as truth of Slaves of Sleep, the late Harlan Ellison has writ on many occasions, including a note in Dangerous Visiobs, SF anthology
AND NOW THE POINT OF THIS RAMBLE: LL made campaign commercials each time he ran for president, all consisting of the candidate seated in a leather English Men’s Club chair, in front of a rather impressive looking home library rambling for 15-30 minutes, leading the viewer to come away with the feeling he was claiming Queen Elizabeth II and family were Iewish, and conspiring with other Jews to flood US streets wit heroin. Also, falsely, that he had recently met with, and advised(implying their support) of dozens of world leaders. This material, probably in the overptotected vaults of the Museum of Radio and Television, would be wonderful to show the quadrennial shift in the man’s views, and why he attracted so many for llowers, including a schizophrenic cousin of mine. Also, editor/authors seem to have missed out nature of the case that led to prison: LL’s minions working airports and other sites would talk people into making small cr d card donations to, usually the Fusion Foundation, then, especially if donors were elderly, invent and submit fraudulent cred card slips for donations several orders of magnitude larger, again, if memory serves.
ShrdluCubed SHRDLU SHRDLU SHRDLU (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed Environment articles
- Unknown-importance Environment articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- Unassessed Alternative views articles
- Unknown-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- Unassessed United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Unassessed United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed United States presidential elections articles
- Unknown-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics