Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
: Based on your editing history you are here on Misplaced Pages to peddle LCHF quackery. There is no reason to remove that source from the article. The medical community does not agree with Noakes' crazy dieting ideas. ] (]) 00:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
: Based on your editing history you are here on Misplaced Pages to peddle LCHF quackery. There is no reason to remove that source from the article. The medical community does not agree with Noakes' crazy dieting ideas. ] (]) 00:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
::I've looked at two sentences, and two sources, and they do not meet the requirements. The first is too weak a source to support a claim that he's been criticized by the scientific community. The second says almost exactly the opposite of what the source said. I've therefore removed those claims.
::I suspect, based upon this experience, that if someone like ] went through the ] section and removed everything that failed verification, then it would be a much shorter section. ] (]) 06:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Revision as of 06:01, 14 December 2018
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
The comment "Noakes's ideas about a LCHF diet have been criticised by the medical community as unscientific” is vexatious, and its source is a rant on a South African consumer-level health news website. That rant, by Carine Visagie, draws largely on an article by David L. Katz, renowned for his self-promoting sock-puppet reviews of his own book.
Tim Noakes is an A1-rated scientist (according to the South African system), who has had the honesty to change his mind in the light of better scientific evidence. He has publicly apologised for the harm he did with his earlier dietary recommendations in "The Lore of Running”. ]
The Visagie piece was last updated on 23rd June 2015, almost two years before Prof. Noakes was cleared of misconduct, and three years almost to the day before he was vindicated by the court of appeal. The HPCSA hearings hinged almost entirely on the validity of Prof. Noakes’s scientific ideas, which were thoroughly vindicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anarchie76 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Based on your editing history you are here on Misplaced Pages to peddle LCHF quackery. There is no reason to remove that source from the article. The medical community does not agree with Noakes' crazy dieting ideas. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I've looked at two sentences, and two sources, and they do not meet the requirements. The first is too weak a source to support a claim that he's been criticized by the scientific community. The second says almost exactly the opposite of what the source said. I've therefore removed those claims.
