Misplaced Pages

:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tobias Conradi/2006 summer admin incidents: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion | User:Tobias Conradi Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:58, 12 November 2006 editNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits []: delete← Previous edit Revision as of 20:11, 12 November 2006 edit undoBadbilltucker (talk | contribs)36,909 edits []: deleteNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
Basically the same page as the page already deleted at mfd. Content and intent are the same. If the user wishes to file an rfc he should do so, but keeping abuse lists sitting around without using them is not acceptable behaviour. ] | ] 18:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) Basically the same page as the page already deleted at mfd. Content and intent are the same. If the user wishes to file an rfc he should do so, but keeping abuse lists sitting around without using them is not acceptable behaviour. ] | ] 18:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as a history of personal attacks. (But note that creator is currently blocked for a week (for similar attacks), so nothing should be inferred from his not intervening to defend the page here.) ] 19:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as a history of personal attacks. (But note that creator is currently blocked for a week (for similar attacks), so nothing should be inferred from his not intervening to defend the page here.) ] 19:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' as basically recreation of deleted material. ] 20:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:11, 12 November 2006

User:Tobias Conradi/2006 summer admin incidents

Basically the same page as the page already deleted at this mfd. Content and intent are the same. If the user wishes to file an rfc he should do so, but keeping abuse lists sitting around without using them is not acceptable behaviour. pschemp | talk 18:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)