| Revision as of 21:25, 14 November 2006 editDaddy Kindsoul (talk | contribs)19,776 edits →not exactly npov← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:35, 14 November 2006 edit undoDaddy Kindsoul (talk | contribs)19,776 editsm →not exactly npovNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| what are adjectives like "funny" and "touching" doing in what's supposed to be an encyclopedic article? this reads like a fan's praise rather than a fact-based, informative article. -] 07:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | what are adjectives like "funny" and "touching" doing in what's supposed to be an encyclopedic article? this reads like a fan's praise rather than a fact-based, informative article. -] 07:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I edited out the biased stuff. | :I edited out the biased stuff. | ||
| It really reads like a Press Realease. | :It really reads like a Press Realease. ''- unsigned'' | ||
| That is because it was taken from a press release, I've improved the article now, however. - ] 21:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | Deathrocker- I suggest that you actually inform yourself about LAM before continually editing the page. The info you provide isn't accurate. Please leave the page alone. | ||
| ⚫ | ::Deathrocker- I suggest that you actually inform yourself about LAM before continually editing the page. The info you provide isn't accurate. Please leave the page alone.'' - unsigned'' | ||
| :I suggest you view other band articles on here to see how they are set out, this is not an overblow fan article or a promo slot. It is meant to be an encyclopediac article on a musical band. | :I suggest you view other band articles on here to see how they are set out, this is not an overblow fan article or a promo slot. It is meant to be an encyclopediac article on a musical band. | ||
Revision as of 21:35, 14 November 2006
 | Rock music Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
possible copyvio
A lot of the text seems to be taken directly from the band's history page on their website. I think that the page can be edited so as to be okay, but I checked out the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems which say that you should blank the page and put up a copyvio notice...? Not sure what to do here - I'm going to wait a day or so and see if anyone has any ideas. Cantara 19:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
What's your concern? The guy who does the web work for LAM wrote that article which was used with permission. The text was ok'd by the band to be presented here on Misplaced Pages.
Okay then. I wasn't aware of that. Perhaps mention of this should be made somewhere on the page, e.g. some text courtesy of LAM, can also be found . Also, would you mind signing your messages? It's a little annoying to have to look at the history to see who left me a note. Thanks! Cantara 20:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
not exactly npov
what are adjectives like "funny" and "touching" doing in what's supposed to be an encyclopedic article? this reads like a fan's praise rather than a fact-based, informative article. -supine 07:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- I edited out the biased stuff.
- It really reads like a Press Realease. - unsigned
That is because it was taken from a press release, I've improved the article now, however. - Deathrocker 21:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Deathrocker- I suggest that you actually inform yourself about LAM before continually editing the page. The info you provide isn't accurate. Please leave the page alone. - unsigned
- I suggest you view other band articles on here to see how they are set out, this is not an overblow fan article or a promo slot. It is meant to be an encyclopediac article on a musical band.
- "None" is not a viable genre. The discography on the version you keep pushing is a mess, the language is awfully POV reading more like a hagiography and it mentions little to nothing of their history. If you feel something is inacurate, then correct it cite a source. - Deathrocker 21:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)