Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 06:02, 18 January 2019 editJJMC89 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators344,657 editsm Removed protection from "Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik (third nomination)": Protection should no longer be needed← Previous edit Revision as of 06:02, 18 January 2019 edit undoJJMC89 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators344,657 editsm JJMC89 moved page Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik (third nomination) to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik (3rd nomination): Requested by Steel1943 at WP:RM/TR: To comply with the current numeric naming scheme for subpages of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, and to allow the simpler creation of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Simon Strelchik (4th nomination) in the event that it is ever created.Next edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 06:02, 18 January 2019

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Curps due to mass vandalism by sockpuppet accounts. Just zis Guy you know? 11:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Simon Strelchik

Previously kept no consensus, but discussion on WP:AN/I indicates substantial sockpuppetry in the VaughanWatch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) mould. The subject is a failed political candidate whose only real claim to notability appears to be as a "founder member" of Free the Children, but this membership was not significant enought to be mentioned in the article for the group itself and there is no indication of how many such there are (and indeed no apparent citation for the claim). For the record I wanted to nominate this myself anyway but was put off by the recent second nom; had I realised at the time that it was a sockfest I'd have done so.

Relisting, then, for a (hopefully) clean debate. Just zis Guy you know? 09:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Which turns out to be a forlorn hope, since the tag has already been removed from the article by one user and two sockpuppets, and this AfD blanked several times. Just zis Guy you know? 11:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.