Misplaced Pages

Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:16, 15 November 2006 editMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits article was deleted and this is not an ED discussion board← Previous edit Revision as of 16:28, 15 November 2006 edit undoMeowy (talk | contribs)8,706 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Headline text ==
Does Misplaced Pages prove that everything Encyclopedia Dramatica says about Misplaced Pages is actually true?

To have repeatedly erased all mention of a culturally important website's existence is an act of breathtaking arrogance. To have now taken it to the level of erasing the talk pages about whether the entry should be restored takes that arrogance to levels of the absurd not seen since a certain emperor pranced around naked in his new clothes.
This sad affair really is a litmus test for the credibility of the whole Misplaced Pages concept. It is possible that, in future years, it will be seen as the turning point in Misplaced Pages's history: the point when Misplaced Pages showed that it has the potentual to be far more dangerous than useful. ] 16:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:28, 15 November 2006

Headline text

Does Misplaced Pages prove that everything Encyclopedia Dramatica says about Misplaced Pages is actually true?

To have repeatedly erased all mention of a culturally important website's existence is an act of breathtaking arrogance. To have now taken it to the level of erasing the talk pages about whether the entry should be restored takes that arrogance to levels of the absurd not seen since a certain emperor pranced around naked in his new clothes. This sad affair really is a litmus test for the credibility of the whole Misplaced Pages concept. It is possible that, in future years, it will be seen as the turning point in Misplaced Pages's history: the point when Misplaced Pages showed that it has the potentual to be far more dangerous than useful. Meowy 16:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)