| Revision as of 00:43, 27 April 2003 view sourceFaré~enwiki (talk | contribs)160 editsm removed spam← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:11, 1 May 2003 view source Roadrunner (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,923 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Liberalism''' may be used to describe a set of political ideologies that are historically rooted in the opponents of the House of Stuart in England in the late-1600's and the proponents of revolution and the Republic during the ]. | |||
| '''Liberalism''' may be used to describe any ideology | |||
| In general the ideology | |||
| that claims individual liberty to dissent | that claims individual liberty to dissent | ||
| from orthodox tenets or established authorities | from orthodox tenets or established authorities | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 1 May 2003
Liberalism may be used to describe a set of political ideologies that are historically rooted in the opponents of the House of Stuart in England in the late-1600's and the proponents of revolution and the Republic during the French Revolution.
In general the ideology
that claims individual liberty to dissent
from orthodox tenets or established authorities
in political or religious matters,
in contrast to conservatism.
1. One usage of the term is for a tradition of thought, that tries to circumscribe the limits of political power, and to define inalienable individual rights. This usage is more common in continental Europe. See classical liberalism or libertarianism.
2. Another, less common usage, is to denote the tradition of various liberal parties. However, though said liberal parties were originally founded on the tradition above, they significantly diverged from it since they came to power in the XIXth century, and liberal parties around the world are now based on a variety of unrelated ideologies, so the ideological content of the word depends on the geographical context. See political liberalism.
3. Another, common usage, denotes the ideology of social-democracy, as defended by the liberal party in UK since the early XXth century, under the influence of Fabianism. It is with this background that Keynes claimed to be liberal in the 1930s, and that many american left-wingers claimed to be liberal. This usage is very popular in the United States. See new liberalism.
4. A limited usage is to denote the tradition shared by the above: authors like John Locke or John Stuart Mill, up to the mid XIXth century.
5. Some commentators try to distinguish in the "liberal philosophy" (which meaning between 1, 3, or 4 remaining unspecified) a "political liberalism" from an "economical liberalism". These dichotomies reflect more about the ideology of those who make such a dichotomy, than about the ideology of anyone else.
6. An unrelated usage denotes a nineteenth-century movement in Christianity; see religious liberalism.
The common meaning of terms evolve: whereas the word "liberal" was clearly associated to meaning 1 (classical liberalism) in the XIXth century, it has come to commonly have meaning 3 (new liberalism) in the US after World-War II, and particularly as McCarthyism made the word socialism difficult to bear, and left-wingers massively adopted the name "liberal". For this reason, US classical liberals adopted the name "libertarian", which leads to other confusion with european connotations of the term. Recently, the word "liberal" has been so much used as a derogatory term by US conservatives that many US liberals (meaning 3) prefer to shun the word "liberal" and call themselves "progressive". In the UK, meanings 1, 2, 3 coexist, since liberalism as an ideology will be understood by scholars as classical liberalism, whereas there is an active political party named the Liberal Democrat Party, and meaning 3 is imported from the US, including the derogatory usage by conservatives.
External Links and References
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Liberalism, by Gerald F. Gaus