| Revision as of 23:09, 15 November 2006 editAivazovsky (talk | contribs)25,346 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:09, 16 November 2006 edit undoSoll313 (talk | contribs)10 edits Replacing page with 'long live nikolai causescu!'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| long live nikolai causescu! | |||
| {{busy|Khoikhoi}} | |||
| ]''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']'''.</div></center>]] | |||
| == Sources for the correct translation of Great Romanain Party == | |||
| Please read the talk page before doing reverts. I already pointed my sources there, including a link to the Romanian Parliament website. Additionally, since I am a Romanian native speaker I am myself able to confirm the correct translation and meaning. ] 08:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == OTE == | |||
| Please take a look at ] article.<font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="3">]</font>] 10:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Name of Thes/niki; Wiki Policies Question== | |||
| Hi Khoikhoi. Thank you for your attention to the Thessaloniki name issue ]. I am a bit put off by discussion that seems to be ''mocking'' in tone (I guess I've just learned what wikistress is). I am also a new user. What Wiki policies should I read up on for do's and don't's? About how to handle conflict? Some of my edits are in places (not just Thessaloniki) where there seem to be real disputes. ] 13:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hiya Khoikhoi, | |||
| I have no idea about Kurdish history, but this pattern of people introducing unsourced, controversial edits & then being reverted doesn't bode well. Not sure if/how I can help. | |||
| Best regards, | |||
| --] 13:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your vigilance on ]. I wanted to ask you about the language of your poem. I know it isn't Vlach, it's much closer to Spanish, and you say it's from Bulgaria--Is it Ladino? --] 19:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| <div style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: larger; border: 1px tan solid; background-color: wheat; color: #500">]<div style="padding: 1em; padding-bottom: .3em">I just wanted to let you know that my RfA was a success. Though you didn't participate directly, I appreciated your diligence in dealing with the Bonaparte sockpuppet's backhanded "support". Thanks!<div style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: cursive; width: 98%; text-align: right;color: black">— ]</div></div></div><br clear="all" /> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You might want to give him a level 4 warning for his edit and previous edits. Just a suggestion.] 22:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == The New Zealand article == | |||
| Hi, Khoi. I know that you've really been around the block here, so I'll ask: Do you know anything about the New Zealand or Australia articles (i.e., disputes, trolls, editing styles, etc.)? Do you keep those or related pages on your watchlist? Have you noticed any differences in styles among editors from different regions (i.e., how do Indians compare to Turks or to Aussies or Kiwis)? Is there more "clanishness" or insularity among certain groups? Thanks. ] 00:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey, thanks anyway. ] 14:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| OK, I'll try. But could you please do me a favour and have a '''professional''' and neutral look '''as an admin'' on the nonsense some users are writing in the article ]. | |||
| It's sad that you critisize us, but stay quite when leading Western scholars are insulted, and authoritative scholarly sources are dumped as "dogmatic and nationalistic". | |||
| ] 02:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : All sources are given in the article. The dispute is about the ''uncivilized'' manner of a few users who constantly remove other sources than those that only support their view. The ] and the ] are insulted as being ''dogmatic and nationalistic'', and leading scholars, such as ], Prof. Enoki (THE leading expert on the Hephthalites), and Prof. A.D.H. Bivar (author of the article ''Hephthalites'' in Iranica) are dumped as ''Persian nationalists''. THIS is hillarious. | |||
| : Britannica does not give any information about the origin of the Hephthalites, the Columbia Encyclopaedia claims that they were ''"either Turkic or Tibetian"''. However, these two articles are '''not''' written by experts. The most authoritative works, meaning Enoki's ''"On the origins of the Hephthalites"'' (1955) and Frye's ''"The Heritage of Central Asia"'', describe the Hephthalites as an ethnically mixed confederation, ruled by an Iranian-speaking elite. The same information is given in Iranica and Encyclopaedia of Islam. | |||
| : The mentioned users, however, delete all of these sources and simply copy and paste paragraphs from Britannica and CE into the article, further claiming that Enoki (a Japanese professor), Frye (an American professor), and the entire EI and EIr are ''dogmatic'' and ''Persian nationalistic''. Just check . | |||
| : ] 02:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == what??? == | |||
| what's going on? why did you rv? ] 02:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I mean he does not discuss anything on the talk page and his argument has been crushed 24 hours ago. ] 02:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am still wondering why are you involved in ninja fighting against Georgia and Georgians, do you have some personal reasons against the country? ] 02:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I bet you, shortly mikka, ghirla & Co are gonna show up and start making derogatory ethnic prejudices and they will probably be supported by you and then consensus: Authority Rule with No ] and ]. ] 02:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I guess you think that Georgians are evil people, who contriuted Stalin and Beria to the world, but even Stalin nor Beria did not do anything wrong to Hungary, Israel or the United States, so you attitude really makes me to feel mystified. ] 03:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Ok, you wonna war? Yoy want to piss me off. If you want to declare a war, you will get it. ] 03:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::I am ] :) ] 03:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::You need people like me on wiki, say hello to ''the bad guy'' ] 03:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| If you aren't too busy, can you look at the external links section of ]. I keep taking out what appear to be political propaganda links (which may include some language classes). Am I right to do so? Thanks--] 06:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| YOU NONSENSE IS NOT RELEVENT, ROSKAM IS THE WINNER OF THE 6th ...I LIVE THERE YOU Don't read and stay out.. | |||
| ABC, CBS, FOX, TV... | |||
| == Pekmez == | |||
| Can you check the recent changes on ] article? Pekmez Kola stuff was put there and now page looks awful in my opinion. I will discuss with author of the changes but first I want to hear your comments.] 19:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==An interesting fact of life== | |||
| Hi. If you remember the incidents on ] and ]: ] is currently "replaced" by ]... And ] appears to be their twin brother... ] 20:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi and thanks for the reply. It appears that a reply of his on ] ("One more thing, PelleSmith: being myself a Romanian, I think of having a quite good understanding of that sort of compatriots like dahn: consciously or not, they interpret perfect urbanity like yours as a sign of weakness. Look at the way dahn is rushing you on the Eliade matter.") is similar to the insults on my page. It also looks to me like they have the same way of constructing a phrase. I'll see about running it through the system, and thanks for the suggestion. ] 13:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Opinion please == | |||
| I've formulated a proposal and need to know what other people think about it. See ] (and click ''talk'' for your comments). The proposal is a result of a lengthy debate/poll in ], but it extends obviously beyond Europe, so I made a subpage before I post it in ]. Thanks. ] 23:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]'s edits in ] article== | |||
| As you've already realized, this user tries to attach links to genocide articles without any reference or proper mention of Atatürk's involvement in the article. I left a comment on ], but I'm not sure he would get my point. Could you please try to take care of this issue? And he recently called the revert of his edits as "vandalism" and put the page in protected status, which I didn't even know could be done by a non-admin. I regret that I still haven't reply to your question about an anon's edits in the ] infobox. I will hopefully look into the matter soon. Regards, ] 23:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Caligvla== | |||
| He has now brought accusations of some sort of politically motivated conspiracy into the Armenia talk page . This is just getting more ridiculous each minute. -- ] 23:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Map == | |||
| Thanks for fixing the image. Cheers.--] 23:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I mean how are they "his maps" when they are uploaded in commons? :rolleyes--] 23:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Placenames == | |||
| Sorry, I was just about to go to bed myself. It's pretty late here. ] ] 23:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Spain == | |||
| The only thing I'm trying to "prove" is that "Spain" is pertinent to articles on Spanish autonomous communities... who could refute that? Another user deleted that entry, prioritizing uniformity to pertinency... | |||
| If you find this issue "pointless", why did you delete my "pointless" change? Sure you don't think this is pointless for any reason. | |||
| Regards | |||
| ] 01:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Hello: the "standard criterion" that supports your change (a reference mentioned in the "Intro" section must not appear in "see also" section) is not met by other references in that same page (references that Asterion didn't delete, you guys don't act based on the same principles). Other prominent pages like the "United States" article don't meet this principle (please, take a look at it). | |||
| : Please let me know which is the Misplaced Pages standard on this point, if there is any, to solve this issue. | |||
| : Regards | |||
| : ] 10:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: The United States article (or the New York article) are examples of articles in which references included in the "intro" are also listed in the "see also" section, and nobody corrected that. As I see, there is no any standard to design the "see also" section of an article, and that shows me how arbitrary was Asterion deleting that entry and how arbitrary is Misplaced Pages. | |||
| :: ] 16:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Candaroğulları == | |||
| Thank for comments. You are right. Contents of these two articles(with some small differences) app. the same. I put "Merge" tag. | |||
| Regards | |||
| <font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="3">]</font>] 09:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You have previously edited the ] article. The article has been put up for deletion. I would like your unbiased input on the article at ]. Along with the discussion on the deletion page you can find information and discussions on this at ]. | |||
| She may not be the most notable person on Misplaced Pages but she fits the notability criteria from the Misplaced Pages guideline ]. Her notability is listed in ] and restated at ]. | |||
| Thanks for your input!--] 21:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Ingria == | |||
| :Can you explain me why other users repeatedly delete my links to other language wiki, but you tell me about blocking policy?!!--] 22:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| See the corresponding talk page. What's your opinion about the last proposal? ] 02:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Could you please take a look again (also see the article and its recent history)? It seems that nobody cares about the inconsistencies of the article. ] 07:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hmmm, maybe we should follow the definitions from other sources, like for example. What do you think? <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 22:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::That page is not usefull for us (it's just a disambiguation page and we have a more complete disambiguation page here). Also, you should note that websites such as http://www.thefreedictionary.com and http://www.answers.com/ jus copy whatever they find (mostly pages of Misplaced Pages). Because of that, their content is almost the same as Misplaced Pages (with a delay). ] 03:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Maps== | |||
| You around? I think I have a solution to the edit wars on the maps... | |||
| :Use the current version I uploaded, the dispute seems to be grey area not the actual location, so by removing the grey, all involved are happy. I am sure I can get David on board with this too.--] 02:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Okay great, glad we can agree, I'll let David know on WikiDE, I'll go ahead and change AZN and GEO too., as for me I am just a friendly wikignome ;) I use differnt names on each Wiki, spend most of my time in Commons and Simple English Wiki--] 03:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey Khoi, got a question for you. How come you uploaded both ] and ]? As near as I can tell, they're exactly the same thing. --] 17:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's kind of bad practice; 'duplicate' is actually a Speedy Deletion criteria. Mind getting rid of one? --] 04:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Armenia strawpoll== | |||
| ''NB'' '''] has now closed''', it being Friday 10th November and about 10.30am where I live. The numbers are as follows: | |||
| *'''Support''' 6 (although ]'s existence has been disputed by ]. | |||
| *'''Neutral''' 1. | |||
| *'''Oppose''' 10. | |||
| As such, no mandate has appeared for making the requested changes to the article. As previously advertised, Caligvla and I are taking a break from this dispute for a week. After this, the case may be taken to the mediation cabal, although I hope to avoid this eventuality. ] 10:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Azadeh Moaveni again== | |||
| Hi KhoiKhoi. ]'s page was vandalized again. This time by a user using a similar name as yours. He was blocked too. I would suggest that we put this site under a semi-protection. What do you think about it? ] 13:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, I agree. You are right, compared to some other pages and what I read here and there, this seems to be minor. Thanks.] 15:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Editing protected pages == | |||
| While I agree with your recent edit removing "Romanians" from the ], you might want to look at this: ]. In essence, by editing substance in a protected article you are forcing your point of view on the majority of editors who can't edit protected pages, which generally should not be done. <sub>└</sub> <sup>''']'''</sup> / <sub>''<font color="black">]</font>''</sub> <sup>┐</sup> 18:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey, don't be sorry—I've been tempted to do it myself. Well, I've been tempted to revert to the version I like and ''then'' protect, which is even worse. =) <sub>└</sub> <sup>''']'''</sup> / <sub>''<font color="black">]</font>''</sub> <sup>┐</sup> 19:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] 3RR violation on TRNC. == | |||
| He is getting quite annoying. --] 19:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Tekleni and sockpuppets == | |||
| Man, that's at least three sockpuppets in a row he clearly knows we know are him. This is awfully ridiculous. <sub>└</sub> <sup>''']'''</sup> / <sub>''<font color="black">]</font>''</sub> <sup>┐</sup> 20:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Assyrian people article == | |||
| ...in no way can you be considered a neutral party in this dispute. You're just looking for a reason to start something with me.23:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Archiving=== | |||
| All i see is a mess! I am really not following the chronology of events! I can't follow the mess re to the archiving process!!! -- ''] 23:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)'' <small>]</small> | |||
| :The solution to that is what i did (not just being bold but Archive 5 is soooo short!). I hope it is ok now. -- ''] 23:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)'' | |||
| ::You can restart discussions. You can copy and paste them. There are a lot of ways but is it acceptable to witness an edit warring about ''stupid'' stuff? -- ''] 23:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)'' | |||
| :::Back to my first comment then...So what was the reason of archiving a short discussion? -- ''] 23:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)'' | |||
| I've just transfered the thread of this discussion to Sangorious's talk. Let's see and sort this out. -- ''] 23:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)'' | |||
| == ] & ] == | |||
| The edit history was messed up somehow. Please give me a sec while I fix it—thanks! :-) <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 00:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, I'm done now. Please let me know if I made any mistakes. Ciao, <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 00:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks Could you add the protection until the problem with user:houtom's points (deletions) will be solved.--] 00:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == same link from Yoruba article; in ] == | |||
| Hi Khoikhoi, | |||
| Same link from Yoruba article; in ]. Lather, rinse, repeat. --] 03:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello my friend. This user is vandalizing two articles: ] and ] through "sneaky vandalism" and ignoring other peoples edits (such as one valid point raised by Gbambino). These articles are already not neutral, but the first one is the worst in terms of intentionally defaming and degrading Iran and Iranian peoples and Iranian civilization. It is a million miles away from neutral. Please do what you can to restore some sanity here. Khaili mamnoon. ] 11:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :In fact, it is Khorshid who appears to be reverting without discussion. If there is "sneaky vandalism", it's not me who's doing it. - ] 11:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Aromanians == | |||
| Hello Khoikhoi, | |||
| first let me say thank you for supporting me in getting the sysop status. I am sorry that I wasn't able to give the list of problems in the Aromanians article, but I promise to do this till the end of the week. I was not able to do this sooner because of some health problems, but now everything's better. Thank you very much for everythign again, Dumitrachi T. Fundu ] 12:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==RfA thanks== | |||
| {| style="border:5px solid gray; border-color: #082567; background:#50C878; padding:10px;" align=center | |||
| |] | |||
| |<font style="color: #082567"><center><big><strong>Thank you for the extra feathers on my wings!</strong></big></center></font> | |||
| <font style="color: #082567">Thank you so much, Khoikhoi, for your support in my ], which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of '''82/0/2'''. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to ]. Best regards, <strong><font style="color: #082567">]</font>]<font style="color: #082567">]</font></strong> 20:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)</font> | |||
| |} | |||
| == Protected page: Iranian Azerbaijan == | |||
| Hi Thanks for the welcome message. I was wondering if adminstarators can apply a POV by protecting an article on a given time. For instance, as regards "Iranian Azerbaijan" article, the arian theory about the origins of Azeris is being protected while there are other theories as well. I don't care about the racial origins but I don't like to see a POV being protected.--] 22:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Its not POV. The only POV thing about it was the external links that were added under the name "South Azerbaijan" which is fictitious and an invention of the 1930's/40's of the Soviets.] 01:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Hi Khosrow ... it seems you are following all my contributions, ok I am happy to have audience(lol). Well you know, we will not always accept that what we are expressing is our POV. I agree that there is not much genetical differences between persians and azerbaijanis (both northern and southern),(some people do not agree). Neither Azerbaijanis are pure turks nor persians pure arians. This land has been a crossroad of ethnicities and the result is a mixture. But one should concede that Azeris have a different idendity as distinct from persians. Any denial of this fact will amount to assimilation. Ans as an Iranian Azerbaijanian let me say the cultural simmilarities between me and a north azerbaijanian is much more than those between me and a persian. This fact can not be a justification for seperatist policies. The time when nationalities were based on ethnicity and race has long gone. We can live within the same borders as long as we accept the differences we have, as long as we accept eachother the way we are.--] 22:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Oh, boy, here we go again. First of all, I am not following your edits, I have several pages on my watchlist. Secondly, There is no such thing as a North Azerbaijan and a South Azerbaijan. Throughout history, there has only been one Azerbaijan, Iranian Azerbaijan. You as an Iranian Azerbaijani should know your own history. Secondly, the people in the R. of Azerbaijan and Iranian Azeri's, the real Azeri's, do not have anything in common except language, the history of Iran, and Iranian Culture. Persians and Azeri's have more in common than Azeri's do with other Turks. Culturally, Azeri's are still Iranics. Just because their language changed does not mean the people changed. I have done lots of research regarding Azerbaijan's history, if you have anything more to discuss, or any questions, please feel free to ask on my talk page (so we dont bother khoikhoi). You must know your history, and you must not be fooled with historical revisionism and politics. Please feel free to ask. (Also, I am no joke, I actually have researched the history a lot. I have read historical texts, I have read many sources, including unclassified Soviet documents, etc... Everything I know comes from reliable Western, medieval, and ancient sources)] 00:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You are very welcome. All the best, ] 01:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 01:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Oops == | |||
| I have done it . Please revert that illicit edit immediately, for the better of wikipedia. ] 02:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey, where are you? Hurry up, wikipedia is taking damage from my horrible, horrible trolling! ] 02:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Kondovan== | |||
| Please keep your eye on it in case they try to reinsert the Azerbaijan geo stub into the article. I dont know why they insist on having another countries geo stub in an article about a place in Iran. Thanks. By the way, you post some very interesting things on your User page.] 03:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I was actually referring to Karcha, not Faouvan (which seems to be a good editor). Karcha is really being a nuisance, now he is trying to change the Rumi article, and look at the Turkish langauge page, I changed to English so that it would make more sense (before it seemed like it was saying that Greece, Bulgaria, etc... all spoke Turkish) and he reverted me... Also, o, I wasnt being sarcastic about your user page. You must do a lot of reading, where do you come across all these poems?] 04:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I had Borat98's contribution list opened in a tab, ready to refresh in anticipation of his next vandalism...but it never came. Took me a minute to figure out why. Quick service on the block! -- ] ] ] 05:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == You're abusing your privelages. == | |||
| I didn't insult him. I meant that exaclty as it was worded. That was very similar to his edits. It removed Assyrian and replaced it with Aramaean. You can check his previous edits yourself. I'm going to pass this on to another admin if you continue.] 08:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Userboxes == | |||
| Hi Khoi. Can you please have a look at the pages of ] and ]? Their userboxes contain attacks on a living person, ], and violates Wiki policy on ] and ], IMHO. I asked one of these users to express his political sympathies and antipathies without offending the President of Georgia but he refused to follow my advice. Despite politics, and the tension that is on at the moment, I think provocative and divisive actions such as those should be avoided. Thanks, ] 09:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Howdy Khoi. I think I will leave them alone. This userbox portrays these users very well. They specialize in slamming Georgia, especially Dimts, an author of this xenophobic userbox, who has not made any significant contribution to Misplaced Pages, but specifically attacks Georgia related ''talk pages''. Thanks,--] 05:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks a lot, Khoi. Trying my best...:) --] 05:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ha ha :)) He is one of the strangest guys I have ever met here. I remember he once attached a template "Iranian states" to Russia and Armenia.--] 07:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Greeting, Khoikhoi. Since you find the idea of somebody running around WP and senselessly accusing you of being a POV pusher to be amusing, you will surely laugh with me at our friend Kober, who is quick to do exactly that against anyone with the audacity to criticize his political idol. Now, since you claim to understand what he is saying, perhaps you could kindly explain to me and ] how is the userbox in question xenophobic? Unless Saakashvili is some sort of holy embodiment of Georgian spirit, requiring everyone to cower while as much as thinking of him, the concept totally escapes me. ] 07:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Ahh what a shame people like him live here near by in Toronto :) What’s up Khoi? What’s new buddy? So being an admin rules eh? :) If you need anything, email me at my old email. Just wanted to say hi! Cheers Khoi! Regards. p.s I did not know that you were Romanian and Pro-Georgian POV pusher according to Persians hehe ] 22:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Tallarmenian tale site == | |||
| Dear Khoikhoi. Can you please tell me why you think this site is racist. Can you give some examples that you find disturbing. Not for arguement I wish to learn so that maybe I can want the web master. thanks] 22:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hi== | |||
| Hi Khoikhoi, if you are not kidding, or not again making some ], I am very pleased to learn that you are of Romanian ancestry. I myself have a few very nice Romanian friends over here. Cheers, ] 00:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, that was my first guess, actually. Regards, ] 00:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yep, I have one Hungarian friend who was living in Romania before coming here. She's also quite nice. ] 00:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You are starting to act really silly. The "proud to be Romanian tag" when you have an anti-Romanian bias just proves that.] 01:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Sure you are. And by the way nice way of suggesting about "doing something about this guy (Constantzeanu)" to Mikka. Very wikipedia-like. For sure that's how an admin is supposed to act like.] 01:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::How should an admin act? Well for starters an admin should not take sides. Secondly if you do have a biased, at least refrain from participating in these articles since obviously you cannot mediate. Thirdly, an admin should not plan with another admin to "do something with this guy" just because you do not agree that "your actions to provide false sources are shameful". That is not wikipedia-like. And fourthly, an admin should not have a negative attitude towards an ethnic group, should not come up with false sources just to push his pov. Should i continue?] 01:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Perhaps you should.] 02:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Many thanks for the near instant reverts for my user/talk page. ] ] 04:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == block == | |||
| You blocked ] for three days, why? I read blocking policy, this is not suitable(Please clarify if I am wrong). | |||
| *Your block is not suitable since he attacked to yourself. | |||
| *This is a very light penalty. Ask for another admin for permanent block or much longer (atleast). | |||
| Regards. | |||
| <font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="3">]</font>] 05:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Dear Khoikhoi, | |||
| Of course I know his/her comments before my first message, I mean you were subject to that message also.Those words cannot be acceptable ones in anyway.It would be more suitable if another admin blocked that uncivil person permanently. | |||
| Forget that words.Be calm. | |||
| Regards. | |||
| <font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="3">]</font>] 06:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks a lot == | |||
| Thanks a lot, for the info on ]. I was wondering why... ] 07:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| It's your turn again, Khoikhoi. ] is really vandalizing the Rumi article. See ! | |||
| I have already reverted twice. I am really tired of this! Please take a look at ALL the changes he did in that article, especially removing 3 scholarly and authoritative sources (among them and article written by Prof. Bosworth in Encyclopaedia Iranica, as well as one written by late Prof. ]). | |||
| ] 11:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Racist comments by ] == | |||
| Because of his racist comments gaiants Tajiks (he called all Tajiks "rats"), I have reported him to admins. Please take some time to have a look at this: | |||
| Thx. | |||
| ] 17:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Altaic== | |||
| Hi, I know i missed some of them. Actually, i was confused which info-box i edited exactly. Anyway, i'll continue fixing them later. Cheers! ] 22:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Open proxy == | |||
| Can you please block ], as you can see , it's an open proxy.--] 23:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for the welcome; very kind. ] 03:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for November 13th.== | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| ! ]<font style="position: relative; top: .3em; font-size: 250%;">'''Weekly Delivery'''</font> | |||
| |} | |||
| <br> | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | '''Volume 2, Issue 46''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 align=center | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |} | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | ''']''' | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| | align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 05:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Circassians== | |||
| Answered. ] 07:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: A request == | |||
| Whoops, I seem to have missed your message -- did you still want me to look at anything, and if so, where? ] 07:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| I just saw your message on my talk page. Quite silly. Your "friendly" warning about the 3RR seems more like a try to intimidate me, but this is just hilarious, because '''you''' were the one who was reverting, not me. (And because you have started reverting, you always had performed one revert more than me). It seems that either you do not understand Misplaced Pages's concepts or you apply them only when they suit your needs. (Ever heard of the Be Bold principle? That was all I did - noticed a mistake, explained in the talk page and corrected it). I should have edited one more time and let yourself perform the '''third''' revert, then propose your blocking, but I don't have time for this kind of foolish nonsense, like others seems to have. ] 10:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Page move == | |||
| Hi! Could you please move ], ] and ] to where they were before a new user moved them without discussion and rationale (], ] and ] respectively)? Thanks :) '']]]'' 21:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks again! '']]]'' 17:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == About Protection == | |||
| Hi, why all of the problematic articles have always been protected after an iranian's last edit? I want neutral admins...--] 22:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Alaha Article == | |||
| Why are you blanking the article? If it needs sources I will source it. Stop blanking it.] 23:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::None of what the article is claiming is "preposterous."] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| As I wrote in the edit summary: | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| "Your credibility is impaired by deleting text; it is dishonest; and creates an irrebuttable inference that your assertions lack credibility." | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| The deleted text is material to the debate on the discussion page; if you fail to restore it, I will restore it as my own comment. | |||
| Your conduct in attempting to suppress this text is further evidence of your violation of Misplaced Pages policies. | |||
| --] <sup>]</sup> 00:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Your threat: | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| :BTW, if you revert one more time you will break 3RR. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 00:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)3 | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| constitutes abuse and disruption. Again, restore the relevent text.--] <sup>]</sup> 00:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| It seems like our friend Jakko or some of his friends recruits new supporters somewhere in the depths of Finnish wikipedia/web. . --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 09:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I think this user is a sockpuppet because every time I revert his vandalism of the article he is right there to revert me instantly. And before he already used a sockpuppet IP. That is suspicious. BTW this is not issue of allowing POVs to be heard - a person cannot come out and claim this and that about a ''legal system'' as I wrote now on the talk. Facts are facts and opinions are opinions and this person should keep their opinion to themselves. ] 10:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thx for not protecting the Timurids article. I have removed your recent edit from the intro and placed it in the "Culture" section. I've also put some more information into the articles. Please take some time to go through the article, maybe correcting spelling mistakes, etc. That would be really great. ] 16:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == I feel atacked too== | |||
| I feel attacked by this] | |||
| '''] 20:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)''' | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Don't know if this is of interest to you, but you seem like a balanced editor on Greek and Turkish matters, so I thought I'd ask for your opinion. I put what I believe to be a balanced, sourced paragraph in the ] article that says, basically, some people accuse him of instigating the Pontic Greek Genocide and the Armenian Genocide, and some people argue he did not, and it's been removed every time. If you'd like to put in your two cents I'd appreciate it. --] 20:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:09, 16 November 2006
long live nikolai causescu!