Misplaced Pages

User talk:Morton devonshire: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:31, 16 November 2006 view sourceTom harrison (talk | contribs)Administrators47,534 edits Another list of pages← Previous edit Revision as of 12:58, 17 November 2006 view source Seabhcan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,216 edits →Another list of pages: conspiracy cruftNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:
*] *]
] <sup>]</sup> 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC) ] <sup>]</sup> 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
*] - more cruft for you. Have fun. ] 12:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:58, 17 November 2006

Mad Dog Devonshire's talk, please sign your posts Friday 27 December
2024 14:43 UTC Talk Archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Conspiracy AfDs What is Cruft? CruftKilling 101 WikiStuff
Jonesites Inner Socks Egad!-io Mumites
My User Page My Talk Page Super Friends Friendly Noticeboard


This user is a member of the Counter-Propaganda Unit
+This user likes getting friendly notices.




Mad Dog Devonshire's talk page

Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click here, or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.

If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Morton_devonshire.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
Contents

Ganser's Work Written With Both Eyes Closed

See this book review, where the reviewer easily discredits the so-called scholarly nature of propagandist Daniele Ganser's work.

Take a look at Roland Rance

I tagged Roland Rance with a db-bio, but someone removed it. I am considering an AfD. The subject just does not seem notable. He chaired a meeting that looks like it was attended by a couple dozen souls at best, another source doesn't seem to exist anymore, and one source is an online petition. He has had a collection of his pamphlets published. I don't think this qualifies for the CT board, or I would have posted on the talk page there. What do you think? If he is truly notable, it isn't established in the article. Crockspot 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Another list of pages

Tom Harrison 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)