Misplaced Pages

Talk:Bergish dialects: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:01, 15 February 2019 editSarcelles (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,112 edits →Definition of Bergish← Previous edit Revision as of 20:46, 19 February 2019 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,548,646 edits Add {{reflist-talk}} to #Definition of Bergish (via reftalk bot)Next edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
--] (]) 19:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC) --] (]) 19:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
::Having suggested a move of ] at the relevant talk page, I advocate a merger of this article with the other and a creation of a disambiguation page.] (]) 18:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC) ::Having suggested a move of ] at the relevant talk page, I advocate a merger of this article with the other and a creation of a disambiguation page.] (]) 18:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

Revision as of 20:46, 19 February 2019

WikiProject iconLanguages Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Definition of Bergish

Hello,

the scope of Bergish in the body of the article includes South Bergish and divides Bergish into Low Bergish and East Bergish. This contradicts . Hence I suggest an only secondary coverage of the aforementioned terminology. Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 09:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

The aforementioned work discusses the issue, which dialects are part of Bergish, in depth. The lists of the

current revision of the article are based on this work. The current body of the article is based on several isoglosses, such as those at the following site: https://rheinische-landeskunde.lvr.de//de/sprache/sprachatlas/dialektkarten/rheinischer_faecher/rheinischer_faecher_1/detailseite_159.html I would like to adapt the article to the former work. --Sarcelles (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Having suggested a move of Low Bergish at the relevant talk page, I advocate a merger of this article with the other and a creation of a disambiguation page.Sarcelles (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

References

  1. Neuere Forschungen in Linguistik und Philologie aus dem Kreise seiner Schüler Ludwig Erich Schmitt zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet. Steiner, 1975, p. 82
Categories: