| Revision as of 21:35, 20 February 2019 editSangdeboeuf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users53,297 edits →1RR: Striking comment – wrong diff← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:04, 22 February 2019 edit undoGoldenRing (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,924 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits on Ilhan Omar. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| ::I didn't. You really are bad with looking at timestamps. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC) | ::I didn't. You really are bad with looking at timestamps. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
| :::You right, sorry. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 17:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)</small> | :::You right, sorry. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 17:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)</small> | ||
| == February 2019 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] decision and for 1RR violation on the page ], you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] (specifically ]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the ] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. ] (]) 09:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC) <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following ] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Revision as of 09:04, 22 February 2019
| This is Sir Joseph's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
|
Template:Archive box collapsible
1RR
Did you notice that the page was under 1RR restriction? This is your first revert of this edit to an older version that existed on the page before, and that is your 2nd revert. Please self-revert. My very best wishes (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- That first edit is not a revert, it is an edit. The second edit is a revert, because it reverts what was previously there. Sir Joseph 04:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- For more information, see here: Misplaced Pages:Reverting#What_is_a_reversion? specifically "You re-phrase the wording in the first paragraph of an existing article." which is "A normal change, not a reversion." Sir Joseph 04:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Sir Joseph: MVBW is correct.
The word "antisemitic" was removed here. You replaced the revised wording with "Allegations of antisemitism" here and again here. The only difference is the word ending; the meaning is largely the same.Please self-revert. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC) (edited 21:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC))
- @Sir Joseph: MVBW is correct.
- For more information, see here: Misplaced Pages:Reverting#What_is_a_reversion? specifically "You re-phrase the wording in the first paragraph of an existing article." which is "A normal change, not a reversion." Sir Joseph 04:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Reported at WP:3RR. My very best wishes (talk) 15:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
AE
WP:AE#Sir Joseph nableezy - 17:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please dont modify your comment after it has been responded to. nableezy - 17:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't. You really are bad with looking at timestamps. Sir Joseph 17:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- You right, sorry. nableezy - 17:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't. You really are bad with looking at timestamps. Sir Joseph 17:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. GoldenRing (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."