| Revision as of 20:39, 17 November 2006 view sourceMorton devonshire (talk | contribs)6,576 edits →Obsession: removed ad hominem attack← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:51, 17 November 2006 view source Seabhcan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,216 edits Dear Mo-tyNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? ] 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? ] 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :First, that sort of thing may belong in the Musharraf article, but here (in Daniel Pearl) by itself without examination it is undue weight. Second, my name is not 'Monty' -- if you wish to shorten it, call me Mort, Morty, Matt or MD. Lastly, please refrain from personal characterizations such as "obsession" -- it's not appropriate on Misplaced Pages to make ad hominem attacks. I know you have been warned about this before -- I do not wish to bring an Rfc or Arbcom case against you -- I think they are mostly ineffective. Instead, I will just ask you politely here to stop making insulting comments towards me. Thank you. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 20:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | :First, that sort of thing may belong in the Musharraf article, but here (in Daniel Pearl) by itself without examination it is undue weight. Second, my name is not 'Monty' -- if you wish to shorten it, call me Mort, Morty, Matt or MD. Lastly, please refrain from personal characterizations such as "obsession" -- it's not appropriate on Misplaced Pages to make ad hominem attacks. I know you have been warned about this before -- I do not wish to bring an Rfc or Arbcom case against you -- I think they are mostly ineffective. Instead, I will just ask you politely here to stop making insulting comments towards me. Thank you. ]<font size=2><font color="Blue">]</font></font>] 20:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::You are very sensitive to criticism, Mo-ty, but I don't 'attack' you. I am sensitive to your attacks on wikipedia content. If you believe the comment by the president of Pakistan on the case is 'undue weight' why do you leave the next comment which states, "The U.S. Government believes that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed conspired in the kidnapping." Is this not equally unweighted? Or do you think everything your government says is gospel? I will remove this statement also for the time being. ] 20:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:51, 17 November 2006
Mad Dog Devonshire's talk, please sign your posts Tuesday 24 December2024 20:26 UTC Talk Archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
| Conspiracy AfDs | What is Cruft? | CruftKilling 101 | WikiStuff |
| Jonesites | Inner Socks | Egad!-io | Mumites |
| My User Page | My Talk Page | Super Friends | Friendly Noticeboard |
|
This user is a member of the Counter-Propaganda Unit |
| + | This user likes getting friendly notices. |
Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click here, or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Morton_devonshire. |
 |
Contents
Ganser's Work Written With Both Eyes ClosedSee this book review, where the reviewer easily discredits the so-called scholarly nature of propagandist Daniele Ganser's work. Take a look at Roland RanceI tagged Roland Rance with a db-bio, but someone removed it. I am considering an AfD. The subject just does not seem notable. He chaired a meeting that looks like it was attended by a couple dozen souls at best, another source doesn't seem to exist anymore, and one source is an online petition. He has had a collection of his pamphlets published. I don't think this qualifies for the CT board, or I would have posted on the talk page there. What do you think? If he is truly notable, it isn't established in the article. Crockspot 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Another list of pagesTom Harrison 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Daniel PearlWhats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
|
