Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
{{Afd-merge from|Electronic cigarettes in Australia|Electronic cigarettes in Australia|25 March 2019}}
{{Copied|from=Electronic cigarette|to=Regulation of electronic cigarettes}}
{{Copied|from=Electronic cigarette|to=Regulation of electronic cigarettes}}
{{Copied|from=Regulation of electronic cigarettes|to=Electronic cigarette}}
{{Copied|from=Regulation of electronic cigarettes|to=Electronic cigarette}}
Revision as of 01:27, 25 March 2019
The article Electronic cigarettes in Australia was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 March 2019 with a consensus to merge the content into Regulation of electronic cigarettes. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.
Division into sections
This article currently has sections on a continent, a country and the rest of the world, three different types of entity (or non-entity in the last case). Wouldn't it be better to standardize the approach by having level 2 headings for continents and then level 3 headings for countries? Phil Bridger (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure what the difference is between a level 2 or level 3 heading is? I don't see what the issue is with the layout or how it could be improved. QuackGuru (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
A level 2 heading uses "==" and a level 3 heading uses "===". Do you really not see the problem with having a continent, a country and the rest of the world as equal level headings? I thought that was was pretty obvious. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Europe
United States
Other countries
It is split like this into three main sections. It is very simple currently. I don't know what it would look like if it were changed. I don't want it to get too complex to read. QuackGuru (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I really don't know what else I can say here, but I'll try. Europe is a continent, the United States are a country, and "other countries" are an afterthought largely inhabited by people who don't really count, even though they make up the vast majority of the Earth's population. Can't you see that this is a silly way to split up the world? Phil Bridger (talk) 20:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I will have to see how you split it up. Each section is in alphabetical order and it is easy to find each entry. My concern is spitting it up into too many sections. QuackGuru (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
