Revision as of 21:23, 19 November 2006 editSteveHopson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,323 edits Creating deletion discussion page | Revision as of 21:51, 19 November 2006 edit undoRough (talk | contribs)121 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{la|Kafenio}} | :{{la|Kafenio}} | ||
Article does not demonstrate notability of subject or provide documentation ] 21:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | Article does not demonstrate notability of subject or provide documentation ] 21:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Which would then include about every other e-zine. | |||
* Kafenio was the first e-zine about Europe | |||
* About half the travel e-zines are patterned after it | |||
* It had the highest readership of all travel zines that ever where on the net | |||
* Was recommended by Writers Digest as one of the best zines to contribute to 3 years in a row | |||
if those are not notable facts I wonder what is. | |||
Because most of the documentation available is on the net I decided to write an e-mail to the former publisher for information, which as far as I learned is a standard way of research. If needed I can produce these e-mails. | |||
The question I have is if this is really abot Kafenio, or, if Kafenio is removed, SteveHopson is right about the lack of notability of Roberta Beach Jacobson below. | |||
] 21:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:51, 19 November 2006
Kafenio
Article does not demonstrate notability of subject or provide documentation SteveHopson 21:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Which would then include about every other e-zine.
- Kafenio was the first e-zine about Europe
- About half the travel e-zines are patterned after it
- It had the highest readership of all travel zines that ever where on the net
- Was recommended by Writers Digest as one of the best zines to contribute to 3 years in a row
if those are not notable facts I wonder what is.
Because most of the documentation available is on the net I decided to write an e-mail to the former publisher for information, which as far as I learned is a standard way of research. If needed I can produce these e-mails.
The question I have is if this is really abot Kafenio, or, if Kafenio is removed, SteveHopson is right about the lack of notability of Roberta Beach Jacobson below.
Rough 21:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Categories: