| Revision as of 19:53, 13 April 2019 edit85.168.239.79 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:04, 13 April 2019 edit undoVif12vf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users80,068 edits Undid revision 892330670 by 85.168.239.79 (talk) Still not accurate!Tag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| '''Economic rationalism''' is an Australian term often used in the discussion of ] policy, applicable to the economic policy of many governments around the world, in particular during the 1980s and 1990s. | '''Economic rationalism''' is an Australian term often used in the discussion of ] policy, applicable to the economic policy of many governments around the world, in particular during the 1980s and 1990s. | ||
| Economic rationalists tend to favour ] policies: ], a ], ] of state-owned industries, lower ] and higher ], and a reduction of the size of the ]. Near-equivalents include ] (NZ), ] (UK), and ] |
Economic rationalists tend to favour ] policies: ], a ], ] of state-owned industries, lower ] and higher ], and a reduction of the size of the ]. Near-equivalents include ] (NZ), ] (UK), and the ]. To a large extent the term merely means ], also called ]. However, the term was also used to describe advocates of market-oriented reform within the ], whose position was closer to what has become known as the ']'. | ||
| As it is a phrase used by ] in '']'' the highest likelihood is the term was drawn from there and its modern denotations can all be accommodated within Weber's usage.{{fact|date=December 2017}} Its recent usage arose independently in Australia, and was derived from the phrase "economically rational", used as a favourable description of market-oriented economic policies. Its first appearances in print were in the early 1970s, under the ] government, and it was almost invariably used in a favourable sense until the late 1980s. | As it is a phrase used by ] in '']'' the highest likelihood is the term was drawn from there and its modern denotations can all be accommodated within Weber's usage.{{fact|date=December 2017}} Its recent usage arose independently in Australia, and was derived from the phrase "economically rational", used as a favourable description of market-oriented economic policies. Its first appearances in print were in the early 1970s, under the ] government, and it was almost invariably used in a favourable sense until the late 1980s. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| == Criticism == | == Criticism == | ||
| The term "economic rationalism" is commonly used in criticism of ] economic policies as amoral or asocial. In this context, it may be summarised as "the view that commercial activity... represents a sphere of activity in which moral considerations, beyond the rule of business probity dictated by ], have no role to play" (Quiggin 1997). | The term "economic rationalism" is commonly used in criticism of ] economic policies as amoral or asocial. In this context, it may be summarised as "the view that commercial activity... represents a sphere of activity in which moral considerations, beyond the rule of business probity dictated by ], have no role to play" (Quiggin 1997). | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
| ==Support== | ==Support== | ||
| Supporters of economic rationalism have presented two kinds of responses to criticisms such as those quoted above. Some have denied that such criticisms are accurate and claim that the term refers only to rational policy formulation based on sound economic analysis, and it does not preclude government intervention aimed at correcting ], ] etc. | Supporters of economic rationalism have presented two kinds of responses to criticisms such as those quoted above. Some have denied that such criticisms are accurate and claim that the term refers only to rational policy formulation based on sound economic analysis, and it does not preclude government intervention aimed at correcting ], ] etc. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | |||
| *] | *] | ||
Revision as of 20:04, 13 April 2019
For other uses, see Rationalism (disambiguation).Economic rationalism is an Australian term often used in the discussion of macroeconomic policy, applicable to the economic policy of many governments around the world, in particular during the 1980s and 1990s.
Economic rationalists tend to favour neoliberal policies: deregulation, a free market economy, privatisation of state-owned industries, lower direct taxation and higher indirect taxation, and a reduction of the size of the welfare state. Near-equivalents include Rogernomics (NZ), Blairism (UK), and the Washington Consensus. To a large extent the term merely means economic liberalism, also called neoliberalism. However, the term was also used to describe advocates of market-oriented reform within the Australian Labor Party, whose position was closer to what has become known as the 'Third Way'.
As it is a phrase used by Max Weber in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism the highest likelihood is the term was drawn from there and its modern denotations can all be accommodated within Weber's usage. Its recent usage arose independently in Australia, and was derived from the phrase "economically rational", used as a favourable description of market-oriented economic policies. Its first appearances in print were in the early 1970s, under the Whitlam government, and it was almost invariably used in a favourable sense until the late 1980s.
The now dominant negative use came into widespread use during the 1990 recession, and was popularised by a best-selling book Economic Rationalism in Canberra by Michael Pusey.
Criticism
The term "economic rationalism" is commonly used in criticism of free-market economic policies as amoral or asocial. In this context, it may be summarised as "the view that commercial activity... represents a sphere of activity in which moral considerations, beyond the rule of business probity dictated by enlightened self-interest, have no role to play" (Quiggin 1997).
The well-known statement of Margaret Thatcher, "There is no such thing as society. There are individuals, and there are families," is often quoted in that context, but the interpretation of that statement is disputed.
Support
Supporters of economic rationalism have presented two kinds of responses to criticisms such as those quoted above. Some have denied that such criticisms are accurate and claim that the term refers only to rational policy formulation based on sound economic analysis, and it does not preclude government intervention aimed at correcting market failure, income redistribution etc.
Others have accepted the accuracy of the description but have argued that the adoption of radical free-market policies is both inevitable and desirable. Another statement by Thatcher, "there is no alternative", is frequently cited in that context.
See also
- Neoliberalism
- Bob Hawke
- Hawke Government
- Paul Keating
- Keating Government
- Rogernomics
- Third Way
- Blairism
References
- Economic rationalism, by John Quiggin, Professor of Economics, James Cook University, Published as: Quiggin, J. (1997), 'Economic rationalism', Crossings, 2(1), 3-12.
- http://www.publicbookshelf.com/public_html/Outline_of_Great_Books_Volume_I/economicr_cca.html
- http://michaelpusey.com.au/
- The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism by Max Weber