| Revision as of 21:47, 22 November 2006 editSolumeiras (talk | contribs)5,973 edits delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:51, 22 November 2006 edit undoManiF (talk | contribs)3,130 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Delete''' ]. - ] 17:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' ]. - ] 17:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Original research, and not many ghits for it either. --] 21:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Original research, and not many ghits for it either. --] 21:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. --] 22:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:51, 22 November 2006
Adam Effect
Interesting, but originial research. —Quarl 2006-11-22 05:53Z
- Delete. No such term shows up on a Google search. See WP:NFT. --Elonka 06:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above, also someone has to clean up after a backslashing proxy. MER-C 06:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Interesting concept, but there is no evidence that this theory has been published anywhere. Though I disagree with Elonka's deletion reasoning- simple Google searches are not always enough for something like this. Usually it's better to use information databases (e.g. LexisNexis). --- RockMFR 06:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Misplaced Pages is not a publisher of original thought. - Mailer Diablo 17:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Original research, and not many ghits for it either. --SunStar Net 21:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --ManiF 22:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)