| Revision as of 23:32, 22 November 2006 editAlan Pascoe (talk | contribs)2,971 edits →November 23: Added entry← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 22 November 2006 edit undoAlan Pascoe (talk | contribs)2,971 editsm →November 23: Corrected entryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ===November 23=== | ===November 23=== | ||
| ==== ] ==== | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :{{lt|Infobox CornishTown}} | |||
| ⚫ | This template is a POV fork of ]. It has been used to promote the belief that Cornwall should not be part of England. --] 23:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
Revision as of 23:37, 22 November 2006
| < November 21 | November 23 > |
|---|
November 23
Template:Infobox CornishTown
This template is a POV fork of Template:Infobox England place. It has been used to promote the belief that Cornwall should not be part of England. --Alan Pascoe 23:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Indo-Iranian-speaking
Delete The template is very empty because "..speaking-nations" templates categorized with an offical language but this template is categorize nations where the language speak, according this template what is next? English speaking nations template with 250 countries? Zaparojdik (talk · contribs) 01:19 23 November 2006 (UTC)
November 22
Template:A week from today
As said on the template, it is useless. It has been made redundant by ParserFunctions. This just puts unecessary load on the servers. ><RichardΩ612 17:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment it does use parser functions, and I'm sure the average user would find {{a week from today}} to be more intuitive than typing {{#time: d-m-Y|+7 days}}... That said it's not actualy used outside a couple of image cleanup templates that could easily do without it. --Sherool (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete. The people who would need to use this template can probably figure out the parser function. -Amarkov edits 19:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- 'Delete per template itself: "This template is officially worthless." Hbdragon88 22:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Tycoon series
This template does not list a series of computer games, but rather any number of computer games that have the word "tycoon" in their title but are otherwise unrelated, and published by a variety of software houses. This is simply not a meaningful grouping; it should either be deleted or pruned to smaller templates that only contain a single actual series each. (Radiant) 17:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Template based on arbritary grouping of video games with a common word in their title. See also Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tycoon computer game, where the main article associated with this template is up for deletion as an externally unverifiable genre of possible original research. -- saberwyn 21:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:1931-32Scudetto
Unused and doesn't seem to have any real use. The information can just be added to articles without the need for all these boxes! ><RichardΩ612 16:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Also nominating for the same reason:
- Template:1932-33Scudetto
- Template:1933-34Scudetto
- Template:1934-35Scudetto
- Template:2000-01Scudetto
- Template:2001-02Scudetto
- Template:2002-03Scudetto
- Template:2003-04Scudetto
- Template:2005-06A-League
- Template:2005-06Scudetto
Template:ULL.CLS
Misleading (it's basicaly just a variation on {{permission}}, but read like a "free use" template simmilar to {{No rights reserved}}). It is also (fortunately) only used on one image. it aserts that "This image is a work of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette Center for Louisiana Studies Center for Cultural and Eco-Tourism. This work is copyrighted, but use is allowed as long as credit is given.". Problem is permission to use alone is not enough to qualify as free content, and furthermore it seems to be based on a permission to use only one particular image (see Image:Louisiana regions map.gif) rater than a blanket policy of the center. --Sherool (talk) 12:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Prime_Television_New_Zealand_primetime
In breach of Copyright, note similar discussion for other NZ freetoair channel: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_October_22#Template:TV3_.28New_Zealand.29_Primetime_Schedule). Collaborate 08:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Relisting to generate actual discussion. --humblefool® 02:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. A template violating WP:NOT, haven't seen that in a while. -Amarkov edits 19:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Silver Dollar City/SDC stub
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Silver Dollar City/SDC stub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I know what you're thinking - why have I brought this here rather than MFD? It isn't a template. Well, its creator seems to think it is, and it's currently being used as a template. And not a stub template either, despite its name. I've no objection to the Silver Dollar City WikiProject - all one member of it - having a template to put on articles about its rides but:
- it should work properly (this one doesn't close, so any text placed after it is contained within the template);
- it shouldn't be called something "stub", since it isn't a stub template;
- it should really BE a template in template space, not a pseudo-attempted-template-page-thing.
As such, I'd suggest that this be fixed so that it works properly, moved to a name like Template:SDC ride, and the current mess be deleted. PS - if it's deemed that this should be at MFD rather than here, feel free to move it there - it really was a toss-up between the two! Grutness...wha? 07:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Relisting to generate actual discussion. --humblefool® 02:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Looks like this was being used as an experimental copy of Template:Infobox roller coaster. I've fixed the article to use that, and the other box that was at the Buzz Saw Falls article he edited shortly afterwards. Without further knowledge of how these WikiProject things work, I don't know what he *should* have done though. Possibly the experimental copy of the Infobox roller coaster template is now redundant? --Stoive 04:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)