| Revision as of 00:19, 30 December 2004 editDmn (talk | contribs)5,898 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:32, 31 December 2004 edit undoJdforrester (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators21,243 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Oppose'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC) | *'''Oppose'''. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support'''. Nice ] '''/''' ] 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) | *'''Support'''. Nice ] '''/''' ] 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Oppose'''. ] ] 08:32, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear:both;" /> | <br style="clear:both;" /> | ||
Revision as of 08:32, 31 December 2004
London ISS
This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.
- Oppose. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ed g2s • talk 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. grendel|khan 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
- Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. Enochlau 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose Sadly tooo blury ] 12:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose--ZayZayEM 00:51, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support -- it is striking how much this resembles fractured glass. --Elijah 05:50, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
- Support - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - Solipsist 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -Lommer | 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Neutrality 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Nice Dmn / Դմն 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. James F. (talk) 08:32, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)