| Revision as of 10:04, 25 November 2006 edit125.238.104.244 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:00, 28 November 2006 edit undoLahiru k (talk | contribs)12,486 editsm moved Talk:Sri Lankan Air Force to Talk:Sri Lanka Air Force: Official name is "Sri Lanka Air Force")Next edit → |
| (No difference) | |
Revision as of 17:00, 28 November 2006
Citation Flags
Added citation flags for a number of statements that look quite dubious. Elalan 14:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The fact that it is a major role has to be stated so by an expert in the field. I think that statements needs to be qualified. Elalan 03:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Pal, I think the common sense is getting so uncommon nowadays. Do you think the Air Force will fly kites while civil war going on??? ♪♫ĽąĦĩŘǔ_Қ♫♪ 03:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- You still haven't answered any of my questions. How is it that the airforce has a major role to play in the civil war ? You may bring up Defence ministry statements but that is not reliable on this matter. To know it plays a major roles implies it significantly affects something ? This isn't the US airforce we are talking about here. As it stands right know what is being mentioned is an opinion. The airforce, by sheer size can't be argued to be significant. So how does it have a major role to play ? How can you measure that ? This needs to be clarified at very least or its original research. Elalan 05:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- LOL...I think Elalan seems to have a problem with the SL army, navy and airforce. You can edit all you want in here man but the fact is that you guys still cant achieve your dream, so you can get back to ur homeland.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.236.167.92 (talk)
- The fact that it is a major role has to be stated so by an expert in the field. I think that statements needs to be qualified. Elalan 03:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Ranked Highly?
I think the comment that the Sri Lankan Airforce is quiet biased. In a fact, by technology and size it is far behind 1st World Nations. Maybe the introduction should be re-worded to disinclude this unsourced infomation?
- NO no, I dont think it should be changed at all. The current wording is fine. And sign your bloody posts next time you moron. ~Suicide Bomber~ 23:00 25 Nov 2006 (UTC)