Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/PANONIAN: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:54, 26 November 2006 editEssjay (talk | contribs)21,413 edits PANONIAN← Previous edit Revision as of 01:24, 26 November 2006 edit undoVinceB (talk | contribs)1,493 edits re allNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
<s><tt><nowiki>{{Declined}}</nowiki></tt>, only because we don't have an <tt><nowiki>{{unnecessary}}</nowiki></tt> template.</s> {{unnecessary}}. If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC) <s><tt><nowiki>{{Declined}}</nowiki></tt>, only because we don't have an <tt><nowiki>{{unnecessary}}</nowiki></tt> template.</s> {{unnecessary}}. If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
<noinclude>]</noinclude> <noinclude>]</noinclude>

First three was edit warring, PANONIAN + 212.200.175.214 / 212.200.175.59 broke the 3RR (here: , , , , , , ), and it is obvious, that they are the same person in reality (for ex: .

Plus: 212.200.175.122 is in the same range as the other two IPs, and it had the same edit, as {{user|WhiteEagleSerbianPride}} - so I'm pretty sure, that all of these are the same, so this literally means, that PANONIAN was the one, who wrote death threats to me, so by yr logic he should be blocked indef. --] <sup>] :-)</sup> 01:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:24, 26 November 2006

PANONIAN

  • Code letters: A, E

Just see IP's contribs. We have a dispute about this. IP is Serbian, and simply reverting my contribs to PANONIAN's versions, several times this means the 4th revert to that version. Vince 15:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

It is more than obvious, even if the IP's does not match with PANONIAN, that they are sock- or meatpuppets of him, since it (they) simply continued the edit war, what PANONIAN started by reverting. No such "coincidences" happen. And I had some death sentences (15:42 & 15:59) immediately after I asked for this checkuser at 15:23. --Vince 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment: As noted, WhiteEagleSerbianPride and the IP's have been announcing "death sentences" against editors. Recommend priority attention. Newyorkbrad 18:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

PANONIAN has apparently left wikipedia (). However, as there have been death threats, I think this checkuser should still be done. We need to know who is going around threatening to execute people. --Tango 22:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

{{Declined}}, only because we don't have an {{unnecessary}} template. no Unnecessary. If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. Essjay (Talk) 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

First three was edit warring, PANONIAN + 212.200.175.214 / 212.200.175.59 broke the 3RR (here: , , , , , , ), and it is obvious, that they are the same person in reality (for ex: same edit within' 30 min.

Plus: 212.200.175.122 is in the same range as the other two IPs, and it had the same edit, as WhiteEagleSerbianPride (talk · contribs) - so I'm pretty sure, that all of these are the same, so this literally means, that PANONIAN was the one, who wrote death threats to me, so by yr logic he should be blocked indef. --Vince 01:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Category: