Revision as of 09:07, 17 June 2019 editBrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,942,733 edits Local election links (3): Rushmoor Council election, 2006 → 2006 Rushmoor Council election; Rushmoor Council election, 2008 → 2008 Rushmoor Council electionTag: AWB← Previous edit |
Revision as of 13:21, 25 June 2019 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 14: cs1 template fixes: misused |publisher= (3×/4×); skipped: unrecognized periodical (9×);Tag: AWBNext edit → |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{{Use British English|date=November 2013}} |
|
{{Use British English|date=November 2013}} |
|
] in blue, ] in yellow and ] in red.]] |
|
] in blue, ] in yellow and ] in red.]] |
|
The '''2007 Rushmoor Council election''' took place on 3 May 2007 to elect members of ] ] Council in ], ]. One third of the council was up for election and the ] stayed in overall control of the council.<ref name=hold>{{cite web| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2007/councils/html/24ul.stm | title = Rushmoor | accessdate = 2010-10-17 | publisher = '']''}}</ref> |
|
The '''2007 Rushmoor Council election''' took place on 3 May 2007 to elect members of ] ] Council in ], ]. One third of the council was up for election and the ] stayed in overall control of the council.<ref name=hold>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2007/councils/html/24ul.stm | title = Rushmoor | accessdate = 2010-10-17 | work = ]}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
After the election, the composition of the council was |
|
After the election, the composition of the council was |
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
*] 8 |
|
*] 8 |
|
*] 5 |
|
*] 5 |
|
*] 1<ref name=country>{{cite news | title = Elections 2007: Town and country go to the polls | publisher = ] | page = 6 | date = 2007-05-04 }}</ref> |
|
*] 1<ref name=country>{{cite news | title = Elections 2007: Town and country go to the polls | newspaper = ] | page = 6 | date = 2007-05-04 }}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Campaign== |
|
==Campaign== |
|
Before the election the Conservatives held 26 seats, the ] 10, ] 5 and 1 ].<ref name=change>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010001_will_anything_change | title = Will anything change? | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-04-26 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151211/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010001_will_anything_change | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> 14 seats were being contested with candidates from the 3 main parties on the council, as well as 4 from the ], 1 ] and 1 independent.<ref name=change/> |
|
Before the election the Conservatives held 26 seats, the ] 10, ] 5 and 1 ].<ref name=change>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010001_will_anything_change | title = Will anything change? | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-04-26 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151211/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010001_will_anything_change | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> 14 seats were being contested with candidates from the 3 main parties on the council, as well as 4 from the ], 1 ] and 1 independent.<ref name=change/> |
|
|
|
|
|
Issues in the election included the recent introduction of alternate weekly collection of rubbish and recycling, town centre redevelopments, ] and ].<ref name=change/> The independent ] Peter Sandy collected 6,000 signatures on a ] against the change in refuse collection, describing it as greed and predicting the Conservatives would lose control as a result.<ref name=test>{{cite web| url = https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-162697610 | title = Big test at the ballot box | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-04-27 | publisher = '']''}}</ref> Another issue that arose during the campaign was the responsibility for a new play area in North Town, ], with different parties claiming the credit.<ref name=play>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010121_play_area_was_not_a_tory_idea | title = ‘Play area was not a Tory idea' | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-01 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151217/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010121_play_area_was_not_a_tory_idea | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
|
Issues in the election included the recent introduction of alternate weekly collection of rubbish and recycling, town centre redevelopments, ] and ].<ref name=change/> The independent ] Peter Sandy collected 6,000 signatures on a ] against the change in refuse collection, describing it as greed and predicting the Conservatives would lose control as a result.<ref name=test>{{cite news| url = https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-162697610 | title = Big test at the ballot box | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-04-27 | newspaper = ]}}</ref> Another issue that arose during the campaign was the responsibility for a new play area in North Town, ], with different parties claiming the credit.<ref name=play>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010121_play_area_was_not_a_tory_idea | title = ‘Play area was not a Tory idea' | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-01 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151217/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010121_play_area_was_not_a_tory_idea | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
Rushmoor saw a trial of ] with votes able to be cast this way in the week before the election.<ref name=ignore>{{cite news | first = Sam | last = Coates | title = Ministers ignore e-voting fraud warning | publisher = ] | page = 4 | date = 2007-03-02 }}</ref> 6,600 voters had registered to vote online as well as 5,500 who had opted to vote by post.<ref name=home>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010003_vote_from_home | title = Vote from home | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-04-26 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151224/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010003_vote_from_home | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> When the online voting opened however there was a problem with the Conservative candidate in Wellington ] being placed against the Labour emblem, but this was quickly spotted and corrected.<ref name=rose>{{cite news | first = Sam | last = Coates | title = E-votes put wrong name next to the Labour rose | publisher = ] | page = 24 | date = 2007-04-30 }}</ref> |
|
Rushmoor saw a trial of ] with votes able to be cast this way in the week before the election.<ref name=ignore>{{cite news | first = Sam | last = Coates | title = Ministers ignore e-voting fraud warning | newspaper = ] | page = 4 | date = 2007-03-02 }}</ref> 6,600 voters had registered to vote online as well as 5,500 who had opted to vote by post.<ref name=home>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010003_vote_from_home | title = Vote from home | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-04-26 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151224/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010003_vote_from_home | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> When the online voting opened however there was a problem with the Conservative candidate in Wellington ] being placed against the Labour emblem, but this was quickly spotted and corrected.<ref name=rose>{{cite news | first = Sam | last = Coates | title = E-votes put wrong name next to the Labour rose | newspaper = ] | page = 24 | date = 2007-04-30 }}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Election result== |
|
==Election result== |
|
The results saw the Conservatives keep control of the council with an increased majority after gaining 2 seats from the Liberal Democrats.<ref name=mixed>{{cite web| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/6621787.stm | title = Mixed results in Hampshire vote | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-04 | publisher = '']''}}</ref> The Conservatives gained in Cove and Southwood by 226 votes and in West Heath by 144 votes to hold 28 of the 42 seats.<ref name=election>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010404_election_results | title = Election Results | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-04 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151245/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010404_election_results | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> The Liberal Democrats defended the other 2 seats they had held, after coming closest to gaining a seat in St Mark's ward where the Conservatives had a majority of 40.<ref name=election/> Labour held their 2 seats, while an independent who had campaigned against alternate week ] was well beaten in Knellwood by Conservative Roland Dibbs who won 56% of the vote.<ref name=election/><ref name=fails>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010566_independents_bid_fails | title = Independent’s bid fails | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-10 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151257/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010566_independents_bid_fails | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
|
The results saw the Conservatives keep control of the council with an increased majority after gaining 2 seats from the Liberal Democrats.<ref name=mixed>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/6621787.stm | title = Mixed results in Hampshire vote | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-04 | work = ]}}</ref> The Conservatives gained in Cove and Southwood by 226 votes and in West Heath by 144 votes to hold 28 of the 42 seats.<ref name=election>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010404_election_results | title = Election Results | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-04 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151245/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010404_election_results | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> The Liberal Democrats defended the other 2 seats they had held, after coming closest to gaining a seat in St Mark's ward where the Conservatives had a majority of 40.<ref name=election/> Labour held their 2 seats, while an independent who had campaigned against alternate week ] was well beaten in Knellwood by Conservative Roland Dibbs who won 56% of the vote.<ref name=election/><ref name=fails>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010566_independents_bid_fails | title = Independent’s bid fails | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-10 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151257/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010566_independents_bid_fails | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
The trial of internet voting failed to increase ], which dropped to 35.2% from the 36% in the ].<ref name=election/> In total 3,827 of the 6,686 people registered to vote online did so, 57.2%, with disagreement over whether the trial was a success.<ref name=future>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2011038_embarrassing_errors_put__future_of_evoting_in_doubt | title = Embarrassing errors put future of e-voting in doubt | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-25 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151323/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2011038_embarrassing_errors_put__future_of_evoting_in_doubt | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
|
The trial of internet voting failed to increase ], which dropped to 35.2% from the 36% in the ].<ref name=election/> In total 3,827 of the 6,686 people registered to vote online did so, 57.2%, with disagreement over whether the trial was a success.<ref name=future>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2011038_embarrassing_errors_put__future_of_evoting_in_doubt | title = Embarrassing errors put future of e-voting in doubt | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-25 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151323/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2011038_embarrassing_errors_put__future_of_evoting_in_doubt | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
Line 24: |
Line 24: |
|
Following the election the only independent councillor, Peter Sandy, resigned from the council causing a ] in Heron Wood ward.<ref name=resigns>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010776_rushmoors_independent_resigns | title = Rushmoor’s independent resigns | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-18 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151310/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010776_rushmoors_independent_resigns | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
|
Following the election the only independent councillor, Peter Sandy, resigned from the council causing a ] in Heron Wood ward.<ref name=resigns>{{cite web | url = http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010776_rushmoors_independent_resigns | title = Rushmoor’s independent resigns | accessdate = 2010-10-18 | date = 2007-05-18 | publisher = ''gethampshire'' | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151310/http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2010776_rushmoors_independent_resigns | archivedate = 12 March 2012 | df = dmy-all }}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Election Summary Begin|title = Rushmoor Local Election Result 2007<ref name=results>{{cite web| url = http://www.rushmoor.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=7259 | title = Local Election Results May 2007 | accessdate = 2010-10-17 | publisher = ''Rushmoor Borough Council''}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | title = Election 2007 Results | publisher = ] | page = 8 | date = 2007-05-04 }}</ref>}} |
|
{{Election Summary Begin|title = Rushmoor Local Election Result 2007<ref name=results>{{cite web| url = http://www.rushmoor.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=7259 | title = Local Election Results May 2007 | accessdate = 2010-10-17 | publisher = ''Rushmoor Borough Council''}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | title = Election 2007 Results | newspaper = ] | page = 8 | date = 2007-05-04 }}</ref>}} |
|
{{Election Summary Party| |
|
{{Election Summary Party| |
|
|party = Conservative Party (UK) |
|
|party = Conservative Party (UK) |
Issues in the election included the recent introduction of alternate weekly collection of rubbish and recycling, town centre redevelopments, council tax and anti-social behaviour. The independent councillor Peter Sandy collected 6,000 signatures on a petition against the change in refuse collection, describing it as greed and predicting the Conservatives would lose control as a result. Another issue that arose during the campaign was the responsibility for a new play area in North Town, Aldershot, with different parties claiming the credit.
The results saw the Conservatives keep control of the council with an increased majority after gaining 2 seats from the Liberal Democrats. The Conservatives gained in Cove and Southwood by 226 votes and in West Heath by 144 votes to hold 28 of the 42 seats. The Liberal Democrats defended the other 2 seats they had held, after coming closest to gaining a seat in St Mark's ward where the Conservatives had a majority of 40. Labour held their 2 seats, while an independent who had campaigned against alternate week refuse collection was well beaten in Knellwood by Conservative Roland Dibbs who won 56% of the vote.
Following the election the only independent councillor, Peter Sandy, resigned from the council causing a by-election in Heron Wood ward.