| Revision as of 08:45, 27 November 2006 editTrialsanderrors (talk | contribs)Administrators17,564 edits Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/HeadleyDown - Restored, nomination at MfD optional.← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:46, 27 November 2006 edit undoTrialsanderrors (talk | contribs)Administrators17,564 edits PircBot - Deletion endorsed.Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ====]==== | |||
| :{{la|PircBot}} — (]) | |||
| Deleted for being 'none notable software', but it has 100k+ Google hits and it's a commonly deployed IRC bot framework ] 02:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd also like to add that PircBot is heavily referenced in the book 'IRC Hacks' by Paul Mutton, published by O'Reilly . --] 02:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Endorse deletion''' of stub which made no claim to notability. No prejudice against a proper article citing reliable secondary sources. I will userfy the stub is that will help. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Endorse deletion, userfy''' and recreate if and when it's reliably sourced. ] 18:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
Revision as of 08:46, 27 November 2006
| < November 20 | November 22 > |
|---|
- Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 November)
21st November 2006
WiktionaryZ
The article deals with a preparatory project for the Ultimate Wiktionary as part of the Wikimedia Project. Andres 01:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion if the above is the argument for inclusion. See WP:WEB. --W.marsh 01:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I think the information is important for the Wikimedia contributors. The article should at least be placed in the Misplaced Pages namespace with a redirect from WiktionaryZ. There is an article on the site on several wikipedias, including de:Misplaced Pages:WiktionaryZ. This German article better explains the importance of the site and it is in the Misplaced Pages namespace. Andres 02:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- See also the coverage on meta:Category:Ultimate Wiktionary.
Andres 02:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse own deletion. In the article namespace, this fails WP:WEB (no media mentions, etc). I would support a move to the project namespace if someone could show how this is relevant to Misplaced Pages, but it doesn't look directly relevant to us, only relevant to Wiktionary, IMO. Kimchi.sg 03:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse, given this already exists where it should be, in meta. Maybe put something in Misplaced Pages: namespace if it's relevant to us. Chris talk back 07:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse, yes, probably belongs in Meta. Guy (Help!) 09:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse, at present doesn't belong in main space. We'd probably as standard respond to a statement such as the above with WP:NOT a crystal ball, or that if it's simply publicity that WP:NOT a vehicle for advertising, I can't see we can hold a wikimedia sponsered project to a lesser standard. --pgk 15:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- endorse per above. --mathewguiver 19:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse, it's just not notable right now. Maybe if it ever is finished and does become a huge hit, then it can get its own article. --Cyde Weys 22:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)