| Revision as of 08:46, 27 November 2006 editTrialsanderrors (talk | contribs)Administrators17,564 edits PircBot - Deletion endorsed.← Previous edit |
Revision as of 08:48, 27 November 2006 edit undoTrialsanderrors (talk | contribs)Administrators17,564 edits WiktionaryZ - Deletion endorsed.Next edit → |
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
|
|
|
|
===21st November 2006=== |
|
===21st November 2006=== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
:{{la|WiktionaryZ}} — (]) |
|
|
The article deals with a preparatory project for the Ultimate Wiktionary as part of the Wikimedia Project. ] 01:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse deletion''' if the above is the argument for inclusion. See ]. --] 01:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**I think the information is important for the Wikimedia contributors. The article should at least be placed in the Misplaced Pages namespace with a redirect from ]. There is an article on the site on several wikipedias, including ]. This German article better explains the importance of the site and it is in the Misplaced Pages namespace. ] 02:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**See also the coverage on ]. |
|
|
] 02:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse own deletion'''. In the article namespace, this fails ] (no media mentions, etc). I would support a move to the project namespace if someone could show how this is relevant to ''Misplaced Pages'', but it doesn't look directly relevant to us, only relevant to Wiktionary, IMO. <tt>].]</tt> 03:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', given this already exists where it should be, in meta. Maybe put something in Misplaced Pages: namespace if it's relevant to us. ] <small></small> 07:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', yes, probably belongs in Meta. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', at present doesn't belong in main space. We'd probably as standard respond to a statement such as the above with ] a crystal ball, or that if it's simply publicity that ] a vehicle for advertising, I can't see we can hold a wikimedia sponsered project to a lesser standard. --] 15:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''endorse''' per above. --] 19:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''', it's just not notable right now. Maybe if it ever is finished and does become a huge hit, then it can get its own article. --] 22:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
|