Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sri Lanka Armed Forces: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:06, 29 November 2006 editLahiru k (talk | contribs)12,486 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:58, 18 March 2007 edit undoLahiru k (talk | contribs)12,486 edits {{Banner WPSLR}} addedNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}} {{talkheader}}
{{Off topic warning}} {{Off topic warning}}
{{Banner WPSLR}}

==Source== ==Source==
http://reference.allrefer.com/country-guide-study/sri-lanka/ Source for more info however do not use information on what it says is miiltary currently as ithat is dated 1988, it will have to used in historical areas. but you can use data from historical periods to fill in incompletes areas, remember don't blatantly plagaise write it in your own words if you are going to undertake this. ] 29 June 2005 04:32 (UTC) http://reference.allrefer.com/country-guide-study/sri-lanka/ Source for more info however do not use information on what it says is miiltary currently as ithat is dated 1988, it will have to used in historical areas. but you can use data from historical periods to fill in incompletes areas, remember don't blatantly plagaise write it in your own words if you are going to undertake this. ] 29 June 2005 04:32 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:58, 18 March 2007

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sri Lanka Armed Forces article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Sri Lanka Armed Forces. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Sri Lanka Armed Forces at the Reference desk.
WikiProject iconSri Lanka Reconciliation (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Sri Lanka ReconciliationWikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka ReconciliationTemplate:WikiProject Sri Lanka ReconciliationSri Lanka Reconciliation

Source

http://reference.allrefer.com/country-guide-study/sri-lanka/ Source for more info however do not use information on what it says is miiltary currently as ithat is dated 1988, it will have to used in historical areas. but you can use data from historical periods to fill in incompletes areas, remember don't blatantly plagaise write it in your own words if you are going to undertake this. CooldogCongo 29 June 2005 04:32 (UTC)

extra information

http://www.rootsweb.com/%7Elkawgw/cdf.html It had good information on history of Ceylon military history CooldogCongo

Violence in December / January

No mention was made to the killing of innocent civilians during the same period. Many of it blamed on the military. Nor any mention was made to the 30 odd missing person’s complaints made at the Human Rights Commission. Again all the missing persons reports suggested abduction by Sri Lanka Military.

Please bear in mind this is an Encyclopeida and not a platform to justify the appalling atrocities being committed by the Sri Lankan military against the Tamil community.

do you have conclusive proofs??

AGAIN SIGN YOUR COMMENTS and do not make claims without evidence, you will just get ignored.A complaint isn't the same as a conviction btw.Pubuman 20:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Following is the link to the full statement released by the European Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) with regards to recent incidents of violence in Sri Lanka.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/5298748.stm
The statement clearly states that the Sri Lankan Military has carried out “war crimes”. --82.40.185.111 11:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
The statement alledges that. It doesnt "clearly say" anything. Either find some proof or shutup and get lost. OzLawyer
This article is loaded with pro-government propaganda and POV. Just in the intro it uses the word "deadliest terrorist." Elalan 02:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
No no, I dont think so at all. This is a very good article about SL forces. No need to change it. And bloody sign your posts next time you bloody guys. Child_Soldier 23:14 24 Nov 2006 (UTC)