Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:56, 29 November 2006

• Table of contents
• First discussion
• End of page
• New post

• ]

These discussions will be kept archived for 7 more days. During this period the discussion can be moved to a relevant talk page if appropriate. After 7 days the discussion will be permanently removed.

Proposed new Misplaced Pages templates

I'm amazed that someone out there not only understands Misplaced Pages this well, but can write jokes about us that are funny. -- llywrch 00:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

That's the funniest thing I've seen since... well... last week. Thanks for sharing! ~ ONUnicorn 18:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

... I sooo want some of those. --Elaragirl 18:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Wonderful! I'm still laughing. Durova 17:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Can someone put this on BJAODN? Really, it might not actually belong there per se, but it is damn funny. --Jayron32 05:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Search change

I've done a couple of changes to MediaWiki:Searchnoresults, to include links to site searches on the three linked engines - what with the index being so far behind (and the mediawiki search engine being so rubbish not very good). As this is likely to affect most people at some time, I'm posting here to invite discussion (crossposting to WP:VPT, please comment on that (WP:VPT) page). Thanks -- Martinp23 22:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I like those changes. Good job. :D --SonicChao 17:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

DE-WIKIPEDIA --> 500,000_500,000-2006-11-23T01:13:00.000Z">

the DE-WIKIPEDIA reached 500,000 articels --Dirk | <°°> 01:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)_500,000"> _500,000">

Janina Korowicka is still red ;-) --Ü 02:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

1,500,000th article

The 1,500,000th article has been created. Anyone know how to tell which one it was? --Xyzzyplugh 21:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Last time I checked the statistics, I saw 1,500,043 as the number. After going to Special:Newpages as part of my patrol, I counted down from the top of the page, excluded the last 43 posted, and came up with this rundown:

42. 21:06, 24 November 2006 ‎We Come 1 (hist) ‎ ‎Haza-w (Talk | contribs) (Created article)

43. 21:06, 24 November 2006 ‎Janina Korowicka (hist) ‎ ‎Slgrandson (Talk | contribs) (Creating EN version of 500,000th German Misplaced Pages article)

44. 21:06, 24 November 2006 ‎Hotel Torni (hist) ‎ ‎Darin-0 (Talk | contribs)

45. 21:06, 24 November 2006 ‎Alonzo Jackson (hist) ‎ ‎Leemays (Talk | contribs)

46. 21:06, 24 November 2006 ‎Briastre (hist) ‎ ‎Hektor (Talk | contribs) (←Created page with 'Briastre')

May I unofficially congratulate Darin-0 (talk · contribs · count) for creating Hotel Torni, our milestone article. If I am wrong, please run an SQL query and tell me who deserved this honour. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 22:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

We delete 1 article for every 3 we create, so the total number of articles grows only about 2/3 as fast as the Newpages log grows. Hence you probably need to go about 50% further to find the article that was 1,500,000 at the time it was created. There is (or at least was) special logging software created just to track down milestones like this. One could also try to back out this information be interleaving the newpages and deletion logs to figure out how the total evolved as a competition between these two processes. Dragons flight 23:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. The 1,500,000 actually keeps changing all the time, and therefore we need to find the article who first got there, rather than finding the current one. Michaelas10 (Talk) 07:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Yay go Misplaced Pages 1,500,000 not long to 2,000,000 now! :) --WikiSlasher 01:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Special:Statistics says it excludes many articles. Did you exclude those articles from counting the 43 backwards? – b_jonas 16:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Please refer to the above discussion. Michaelas10 (Talk) 16:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

The anouncement says the lucky article was Kanab Ambersnail, although the creator's Talk page seems to indicate that it was one of four possible candidates, and the others were inconsequential. It looks like we'll never know. --Ybbor 22:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, Kanab was chosen solely as a symbolic 1.5m article, simply because there was no organization to find the formal milestone article. This article has the most opportunity for growth, and is the most important, being an endangered species, versus a hotel and an American football player. -- Zanimum 16:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing quite like being named as a milestone to have a page brought up to a high level of quality. I'll wager a small sum that it has had significantly more improvements than article number 1,499,999. :-) — RJH (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Experts rate Misplaced Pages's accuracy higher than non-experts

It's not a very big sample, but ...

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061127-8296.html

User:Zoe|(talk) 23:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages community forums
• Misplaced Pages news
• To Village Pump (policy)