| Revision as of 02:56, 30 November 2006 editSteveHopson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,323 edits Questions for Rough← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:21, 30 November 2006 edit undoA. B. (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,775 edits →Vote-stacking?: why all these editors interested in both Jacobson and Suite101.com -- what's the connection?Next edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| OK ], its reached the point that your history of deception in these discussions limit my ability to believe your statements. On at least two occasions you have recreated articles that were deleted and you have removed editorial notices from other articles. ''Now you tell us that you wrote for both Kafenio and Suite101?'' Why did you not disclose this in your defense of the Kafenio AfD? Indeed earlier in this Suite101 AfD discussion you wrote, "I agree that it is bad style to have a company employee write an article for Misplaced Pages." Why didn't you come clean at that time and admit that you wrote for that publication? ] 02:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | OK ], its reached the point that your history of deception in these discussions limit my ability to believe your statements. On at least two occasions you have recreated articles that were deleted and you have removed editorial notices from other articles. ''Now you tell us that you wrote for both Kafenio and Suite101?'' Why did you not disclose this in your defense of the Kafenio AfD? Indeed earlier in this Suite101 AfD discussion you wrote, "I agree that it is bad style to have a company employee write an article for Misplaced Pages." Why didn't you come clean at that time and admit that you wrote for that publication? ] 02:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::I am pretty confused. There are all these people that are now involved with the Suite101.com AfD that were involved with | |||
| ::*] | |||
| ::*] | |||
| ::*] | |||
| ::*] | |||
| ::I why multiple editors would be independently involved with all 4 of those articles/AfDs since Ms. Jacobson is a common element -- but why would all these editors then reconvene for the Suite101.com AfD? Why not one of the many other fine AfDs also underway such as ], ], or ]? As already conceded on my ], I'm a sorry detective -- someone help me out here. Thanks, --] 03:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:21, 30 November 2006
Vote-stacking?
As anyone who's read my flip-flopping on this article knows, I don't have a strong postion as to whether to delete or keep. I nominated it so as to get an honest discussion about what to do. I was concerned to note the following:
- selected articles of interest to Youtrue (talk • contribs) (out of his/her 9 total edits since registering 26 November):
- Chalki added link to article by Roberta Beach Jacobson
- CWA
- Roberta Beach Jacobson
- Symi added link to article by Roberta Beach Jacobson
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Irascible Professor
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kafenio
Coincidence?
--A. B. 20:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- 213.42.21.78 (talk • contribs) -- Note 213.42.21.78's support for Rough in a totally unrelated editing dispute. --A. B. 21:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- See the comments I left for the admins that closed the two other AfDs:
- --A. B. 21:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
No, we are vacationing both on the same Greek Island, have both contributed to both Kafenio and Suite101 and we seem to be in agreement, besides that Mark Shapiro -- IP -- is a good friend of ours, so why would you be surprised? Rough 00:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you would have looked at User talk:Moondyne over CWA you would have found that the discussion was about an article that YoueTrue did not vote for in the article mentioned before on his list. I was going through Moondyne's : Moondyne edit list to see how he got to that article (lomg expoerience editing french wikipedia) and found that he had deleted CWA previously entered by YouTrue. I just told him that it was a legit organization. Hope this helps Rough 00:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I'll take it that you're traveling. But what about this new comment from 200.106.170.4 (talk · contribs)? Two of his/her only 3 edits have been to this AfD and to your Roberta Beach Jacobson article. --A. B. 01:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- The IP address 200.106.170.4 is in Bogotá, Columbia so it's doubtful the person is related to Rough. --Oakshade 01:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
OK Rough, its reached the point that your history of deception in these discussions limit my ability to believe your statements. On at least two occasions you have recreated articles that were deleted and you have removed editorial notices from other articles. Now you tell us that you wrote for both Kafenio and Suite101? Why did you not disclose this in your defense of the Kafenio AfD? Indeed earlier in this Suite101 AfD discussion you wrote, "I agree that it is bad style to have a company employee write an article for Misplaced Pages." Why didn't you come clean at that time and admit that you wrote for that publication? SteveHopson 02:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- I am pretty confused. There are all these people that are now involved with the Suite101.com AfD that were involved with
- I why multiple editors would be independently involved with all 4 of those articles/AfDs since Ms. Jacobson is a common element -- but why would all these editors then reconvene for the Suite101.com AfD? Why not one of the many other fine AfDs also underway such as Florence High School (Alabama), CAT1-X Hyperion Gundam series, or Estonian Orthodox Church Pilgrimage? As already conceded on my talk page, I'm a sorry detective -- someone help me out here. Thanks, --A. B. 03:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)