| Revision as of 09:22, 15 August 2019 editDisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers49,146 edits →Florin Court: pct← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:37, 15 August 2019 edit undoGoodwillgames (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,100 edits FireNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Hi. It just isn't that big a deal. One flat had a fire, it caused some damage, they fixed it, it was years ago. How can you think it is notable enough to put in the article? I know it ''seemed'' a big deal at the time{{snd}}I worked there, I saw the aftermath the next day and in the months afterwards{{snd}}but we are six years on now and the lasting effect is absolutely zero, rendering it an irrelevant footnote. Best wishes ] (]) 09:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC) | Hi. It just isn't that big a deal. One flat had a fire, it caused some damage, they fixed it, it was years ago. How can you think it is notable enough to put in the article? I know it ''seemed'' a big deal at the time{{snd}}I worked there, I saw the aftermath the next day and in the months afterwards{{snd}}but we are six years on now and the lasting effect is absolutely zero, rendering it an irrelevant footnote. Best wishes ] (]) 09:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC) | ||
| Hello there, how many listed buildings caught fire in London in the recent years? The story ended up on the second page of the ], ] and all major newspapers. Unless you have a direct interest in the building, like owning a flat or knowing someone that owns a flat there, your intervention to remove that section looks suspicious, like hiding the history of the building. Next step please also remove that part about a fire in London in 1666. At that time it looked like a big deal, but 353 years have passed, and now there are no traces of it, a part from a ]. I am surprised I have to explain something like this to an experienced Editor such as you. I contributed quite a lot to Florin Court page, and no information in there appears so redundant to be removed completely. ] (]) 10:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:37, 15 August 2019
Florin Court
Hi. It just isn't that big a deal. One flat had a fire, it caused some damage, they fixed it, it was years ago. How can you think it is notable enough to put in the article? I know it seemed a big deal at the time – I worked there, I saw the aftermath the next day and in the months afterwards – but we are six years on now and the lasting effect is absolutely zero, rendering it an irrelevant footnote. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello there, how many listed buildings caught fire in London in the recent years? The story ended up on the second page of the Evening Standard, The Guardian and all major newspapers. Unless you have a direct interest in the building, like owning a flat or knowing someone that owns a flat there, your intervention to remove that section looks suspicious, like hiding the history of the building. Next step please also remove that part about a fire in London in 1666. At that time it looked like a big deal, but 353 years have passed, and now there are no traces of it, a part from a Monument. I am surprised I have to explain something like this to an experienced Editor such as you. I contributed quite a lot to Florin Court page, and no information in there appears so redundant to be removed completely. Goodwillgames (talk) 10:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)