| Revision as of 21:44, 30 November 2006 editDPeterson (talk | contribs)4,116 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:59, 30 November 2006 edit undoSteel (talk | contribs)20,265 edits StopNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ==Removing Material on Schizophrenia Page== | ==Removing Material on Schizophrenia Page== | ||
| Please do not delete material from the Schizophrenia page that is referenced and appropriately sourced. There is a place on the discussion page to discuss the issue...but deleting material as you have might be considered vandalism. Discussing your concerns on the talk page would be a better (more constructive) approach. <font color="Red">]</font><sup>]</sup> 21:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | Please do not delete material from the Schizophrenia page that is referenced and appropriately sourced. There is a place on the discussion page to discuss the issue...but deleting material as you have might be considered vandalism. Discussing your concerns on the talk page would be a better (more constructive) approach. <font color="Red">]</font><sup>]</sup> 21:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :There has been a lot of discussion regarding that section of the ] article, including an RfC. Every user, as far as I can see, supports its inclusion. You are going against a consensus of everyone, which is disruptive, and if you remove that section again you will be blocked. -- ] 21:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:59, 30 November 2006
Hi y-all!
Leave me a message.
Removing Material on Schizophrenia Page
Please do not delete material from the Schizophrenia page that is referenced and appropriately sourced. There is a place on the discussion page to discuss the issue...but deleting material as you have might be considered vandalism. Discussing your concerns on the talk page would be a better (more constructive) approach. DPeterson 21:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- There has been a lot of discussion regarding that section of the Schizophrenia article, including an RfC. Every user, as far as I can see, supports its inclusion. You are going against a consensus of everyone, which is disruptive, and if you remove that section again you will be blocked. -- Steel 21:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)