Misplaced Pages

Gracenote: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:37, 2 December 2006 editCorbinSimpson (talk | contribs)1,797 edits Lawsuits Against Licensees: Manual of Style fix. Fixing scope of Gracenote v Musicmatch to match Gracenote v Roxio.← Previous edit Revision as of 21:52, 2 December 2006 edit undoSicking (talk | contribs)53 editsm Commercialization and controversyNext edit →
Line 72: Line 72:


==References== ==References==
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/12/02/1955245.shtml
<references/> <references/>



Revision as of 21:52, 2 December 2006

For grace notes in music, see grace note.
This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Gracenote" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2006) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Gracenote Inc.
File:Gracenote logo.png
Company typePrivate
Founded1998
HeadquartersEmeryville, California, USA
ProductsDigital music recognition technology
Number of employees95 (2006)
Websitewww.gracenote.com

Gracenote is a commercial enterprise which maintains and licenses a database containing information about the contents of audio CDs. The database is accessible online over the Internet. Computer software applications such as iTunes that are capable of playing CDs use Gracenote's CDDB or similar commercial services such as All Media Guide's AMG LASSO and MusicIP, or open-source projects such as freedb and MusicBrainz. These programs generally offer the option of contributing track listings, and most of the track listings in the Gracenote database are voluntary contributions by individual users of CD-player software.

Additionally, Gracenote operates a digital file identification service which allows digital music files to be identified. As well as a media management service for media management such as the generation of playlists, and recommendation of music.

Gracenote's database is mainly created via the contributions of its many users. If the music is not available in the Gracenote database, the service requests the user to input information such as the artist, album, and song names related to the music. Gracenote also receives some music information from third pary database companies and record labels.

Background

Gracenote began in 1993 as an open source project involving a CD player program named xmcd. The xmcd player was developed by Ti Kan, and had the ability to store and recognize CDs from a database. Xmcd users regularly sent additional CD information to Mr. Kan for inclusion in the database via email. By 1995, the database had become unwieldy and Steve Scherf, a friend of Mr. Kan was recruited to build a server to store the CD information in a network database. Later, hosting facilities and an advertising business model were provided by an ex-pat Scot living in Texas, Graham Toal.

CDs do not generally contain any digitally-encoded information about their contents (see CD-Text), Kan developed software which identifies and looks up CDs based on TOC information stored at the beginning of each disc. A TOC, or Table of Contents, is a list of offsets corresponding to the start of each track on a CD. The matching is fuzzy and tolerates some variation in track offsets.

Some computer users who have copied vinyl LPs from their turntables onto CD-Rs have been surprised to find their computers correctly displaying the titles and track listings when these CD-Rs are played on their computer. This happens when a commercial CD is a remastered version of an LP, containing the same tracks in the same order. If the track offsets of the homemade CD match the track timings of the commercial CD to within a second, the CDDB database can identify the CD successfully.

Commercialization and controversy

In 1998, the service was purchased by Escient, a consumer electronics manufacturer and operated as a business unit within the Indiana based company. CDDB was then spun out of Escient and then in July of 2000 renamed Gracenote (press release). The maneuver was and remains controversial, because the CDDB database was and remains to be built on the voluntary submission of CD track data by thousands of individual users. Initially, most of these were users of the xmcd CD player program. The xmcd program itself was an open-source, GPL project, and many listing contributors assumed that the database was open-source as well due to the GPL notice on the cddb.com website's download page and support page. The website was modified in 1998 to state that the database is the "property" of CDDB.

As of 2005, Gracenote claims that its database contains information on almost 4 million CDs. The reliability both of this statement and of the database itself have been challenged. Because the information going into the database has not been subjected to quality control, duplicate entries are very common. David Jennings, in an article entitled "How many CDs are there in the world?" gives an example of a six-CD set in which "two of the six CDs appear twice in the database, and one appears three times" (article) An article on the Seattle Times website cites Ty Roberts, chief technology officer of Gracenote, as saying that there are approximately 500,000 individual CD titles commercially released and available for sale today in the United States.

Lawsuits Against Licensees

Gracenote v. Roxio

In 2001, Gracenote sued Roxio for "breach of contract, patent infringement, trademark infringement and other violations of Federal law" (press release) when Roxio tried to switch to freedb. Roxio filed countersuit against Gracenote for fraudulently obtaining a patent, misuse of said patent, antitrust behaviour, and breach of contract (press release). The case was settled in 2002.

Gracenote v. Musicmatch

In 2002, Gracenote sued another former licensee, Musicmatch, for breach of contract and patent violations. Musicmatch filed a counter-suit against Gracenote. The Northern District Court in California ruled on August 26, 2004 in favor of Musicmatch. The case was settled in 2004 after Musicmatch received summary judgement on all of Gracenote's patent claims.

A summary judgement found that Musicmatch's CDDB replacement service does not violate Gracenote's patents. The court also found significant evidence that Gracenote may have obtained its patents fraudulently. The court order is available online. Later, the court issued a decision that Gracenote did not obtain its patents fraudulently, but the decision that Musicmatch does not violate any of Gracenote's patents was clear.

There has been speculation that Yahoo! had been holding off its decision to purchase Musicmatch for nearly seven months until the August 26th court order was issued. According to this speculation, the court decision "may have cleared the financial picture" for Yahoo!'s purchase of Musicmatch. The purchase of Musicmatch by Yahoo! was announced only two weeks after the August 26th court decision. Musicmatch and Gracenote settled shortly thereafter.

Until the Musicmatch case, Gracenote attempted to aggressively use its patents in an attempt to enforce a monopoly in commercial CD indentification services. The inability of Gracenote to enforce its patent in the Musicmatch case opened the market for competition, and a growing global group of companies continue to enter media identification and metadata marketplace.

A summarized overview of the case is available at the Manatt website within Mr. Robert D. Becker's list of representative cases. Mr. Becker was one of Musicmatch's lawyers during the case.

Competition

After the commercialization of Gracenote a few other music databases started up such as Freedb, AMG LASSO, MusicIP, and MusicBrainz.

Yahoo's Musicmatch Jukebox no longer uses the Gracenote database and has started its own database called CDi; but, also gets some of its data from All Music Guide. Microsoft also used the Gracenote database information at one point through one of Gracenote's licencees Tunes.com.

See also

References

http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/12/02/1955245.shtml

  1. "Online music services need to meet demand". The Seattle Times. 2005. Retrieved 2006-11-29.
  2. "Gracenote under pressure". CNET News.com. 2001. Retrieved 2006-11-29.

External links

Categories: