Revision as of 05:32, 19 October 2019 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,745 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 19 October 2019 edit undoClayoquot (talk | contribs)Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,478 edits →Request for reassessment - postpartum blues: reNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
I have significantly expanded the article on postpartum blues and would like to request a reassessment. The article is currently rated as start-class and does not have a rating on the importance scale. Thank you! | I have significantly expanded the article on postpartum blues and would like to request a reassessment. The article is currently rated as start-class and does not have a rating on the importance scale. Thank you! | ||
] (]) 14:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC) | ] (]) 14:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
: ], and thanks for your work on this article! You have hugely improved it with good writing and high-quality sources. I don't consider myself to be knowledgable in this topic, so personally I would rather defer to someone else to assess it. This WikiProject doesn't have a lot of watchers, so you might want to put in a request at ] which is much more active. Another option is to nominate it for ]. If nobody steps up to assess the article, don't feel bad - people here usually prefer to solve problems than to reassess good work. ] (] <nowiki>|</nowiki> ]) 17:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:16, 19 October 2019
Women's Health Project‑class | |||||||
|
Women Project‑class | |||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's Health and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Stop the Bans
Project members are invited to help expand Stop the Bans. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:28, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Digital media use and mental health FA nom
Hello! I was wondering if any members of the WikiProject could kindly take a look at the review for this article that I nominated. The recent DYK may be of interest to the WikiProject. -- 14:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red's stub contest is starting now
Our three-month stub contest is starting now and will continue until the end of the year. Although there will be no physical prizes, each month (October, November and December) recognition will be given to the winners of two different sections: one for new stubs, the other for enhancing existing stubs to start class and beyond. The contest is open to all registered members of Women in Red. Join in now and help us improve women's coverage on Misplaced Pages.--Ipigott (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Request for reassessment - postpartum blues
I have significantly expanded the article on postpartum blues and would like to request a reassessment. The article is currently rated as start-class and does not have a rating on the importance scale. Thank you! Mlshulk (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks for your work on this article! You have hugely improved it with good writing and high-quality sources. I don't consider myself to be knowledgable in this topic, so personally I would rather defer to someone else to assess it. This WikiProject doesn't have a lot of watchers, so you might want to put in a request at WT:MED which is much more active. Another option is to nominate it for WP:GA. If nobody steps up to assess the article, don't feel bad - people here usually prefer to solve problems than to reassess good work. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 17:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)