| Revision as of 21:22, 5 December 2006 editとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:23, 5 December 2006 edit undoHusnock (talk | contribs)12,977 edits grammerNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per lack of verifiability. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 21:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per lack of verifiability. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 21:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''STRONGEST KEEP EVER''': |
*'''STRONGEST KEEP EVER''': Good Lord, this is getting silly. the copyright issue was investigated by at least three admins and cleared. The article is also full of references to information put forth on Star Trek shows, info from novels, etc. The reference provided is the only one I could remember and is actually a pretty intersting book, but there are '''*hundreds*''' of other. Starfleet Security is '''VERY CLEARLY''' a part of the Star Trek universe established as canon and this article should in no way ever be deleted. -] 21:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''', bad faith nom. Same people are afding star trek articles and making an overall mess. The previous nomination was just ] and not son after people pushed for deletion at ]. Now they are trying to get canon stuff deleted. Even the novice star trek fan knows that there is a starfleet security... --<small>] ]</small> 21:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''', bad faith nom. Same people are afding star trek articles and making an overall mess. The previous nomination was just ] and not son after people pushed for deletion at ]. Now they are trying to get canon stuff deleted. Even the novice star trek fan knows that there is a starfleet security... --<small>] ]</small> 21:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 5 December 2006
Starfleet Security
This is an article which has just been rescued from certain death as a copyright violation from Memory Alpha, but cites as it sole source a novel written from the perspective of a security officer (and I don't think it's canon either) and the MA article from which it was originally copied and now rewritten, albeit still primarily from an in-universe perspective. Seems to me this isa subject best left in Memory Alpha. Give it a red shirt and put it in the landing party, I say. Guy (Help!) 21:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of verifiability. Cowman109 21:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- STRONGEST KEEP EVER: Good Lord, this is getting silly. the copyright issue was investigated by at least three admins and cleared. The article is also full of references to information put forth on Star Trek shows, info from novels, etc. The reference provided is the only one I could remember and is actually a pretty intersting book, but there are *hundreds* of other. Starfleet Security is VERY CLEARLY a part of the Star Trek universe established as canon and this article should in no way ever be deleted. -Husnock 21:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, bad faith nom. Same people are afding star trek articles and making an overall mess. The previous nomination was just closed and not son after people pushed for deletion at deletion review. Now they are trying to get canon stuff deleted. Even the novice star trek fan knows that there is a starfleet security... --Cat out 21:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)