| Revision as of 08:50, 6 December 2006 editDrKay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators159,759 edits →[] and []← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:02, 11 December 2006 edit undoRetired username (talk | contribs)48,708 edits Closing debate; result was deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ] 18:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] and ]=== | ===] and ]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 18: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above, until more notability can be determined. ] 23:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per above, until more notability can be determined. ] 23:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete all''' ] is completely useless - it merely reproduces material already found on ]. ] and ] only contain genealogical information, and wikipedia is not a repository for family trees. Ordinarily, I agree that empresses are notable, but in this case there appears (on the basis of the articles) to be nothing notable about them other than they married ]. ] 08:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete all''' ] is completely useless - it merely reproduces material already found on ]. ] and ] only contain genealogical information, and wikipedia is not a repository for family trees. Ordinarily, I agree that empresses are notable, but in this case there appears (on the basis of the articles) to be nothing notable about them other than they married ]. ] 08:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 18:02, 11 December 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Ayisheh Sultan Begum and Gulnar Agacheh
Second proposed deletion Dec 5, 2006: "article does not establish notability, non-notable (plural) spouse of someone notable". Supported by prod2 template. Deprodded Nov 11, 2006: "removed prod. - notability is established, in serious need of expansion". See also AfD discussion on Bibi Mubarika Yusufzay. Procedural listing by me - Neutral Mereda 16:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Gulnar Agacheh similarly nominated because of second prod "article does not establish notability, non-notable (plural) spouse of someone notable" after previous deprod (no comment given). Procedural listing by me - Neutral Mereda 16:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Mereda 16:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Babur. utcursch | talk 17:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Mention in Babur if verified. Redirect unnecessary. - crz crztalk 17:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above, until more notability can be determined. JRP 23:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all Gulnar Agacheh is completely useless - it merely reproduces material already found on Babur. Bibi Mubarika Yusufzay and Ayisheh Sultan Begum only contain genealogical information, and wikipedia is not a repository for family trees. Ordinarily, I agree that empresses are notable, but in this case there appears (on the basis of the articles) to be nothing notable about them other than they married Babur. DrKiernan 08:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.