Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/History and geography: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:06, 6 December 2006 editConstanz (talk | contribs)4,319 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:57, 6 December 2006 edit undoRedMC (talk | contribs)398 edits Talk:Flag of PolandNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{RFCheader|History and geography}} {{RFCheader|History and geography}}
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->
*]: discussion about the colour of the flag of Poland, if it is white/red or grey/red, and if it is possible on en.wiki to adopt a solution different from the one chosen by pl.wiki, of if they are authoritative here.16:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
*] certain users pushing the Soviet view that Soviet Union did not occupy the Baltic states. Despite proof (on talk page) that most of the world retained the Soviets occupied the countries, some users keep adding unsuitable POV tags to the article.16:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC) *] certain users pushing the Soviet view that Soviet Union did not occupy the Baltic states. Despite proof (on talk page) that most of the world retained the Soviets occupied the countries, some users keep adding unsuitable POV tags to the article.16:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
*] 10:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC) *] 10:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:57, 6 December 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • Talk:Flag of Poland: discussion about the colour of the flag of Poland, if it is white/red or grey/red, and if it is possible on en.wiki to adopt a solution different from the one chosen by pl.wiki, of if they are authoritative here.16:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Occupation of Latvia 1940-1945 certain users pushing the Soviet view that Soviet Union did not occupy the Baltic states. Despite proof (on talk page) that most of the world retained the Soviets occupied the countries, some users keep adding unsuitable POV tags to the article.16:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Temple Street 10:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Hafrada#To_Moshe Dispute on how a source should be identified. 06:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Fork_in_the_road#Image_RFC Dispute about whether an image would improve the article 22:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Thanksgiving: A discussion on whether to split the article into separate Canadian and American versions. --20:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Birka. Dispute over the appropriateness of quoting primary sources at length. --Ghirla 08:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Nordic theory This is an article about the history of the concept of the "blond blue-eyed" master-race associated with Nazism. POV dispute about neutrality of the article. 13:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks#NPOV Dispute Some users say that it's neural and includes enough on alternate theories, while others say that it favors the Government's POV and doesn't include enough on the alternate theories.--18:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Thomas Jefferson#Comments. Should this article (and related articles) state, without explanation, that Jefferson "founded and led the "Republican Party"?
  • Talk:Palestine. Disagreement over sources used for the portrayal of the economy and population of Ottoman Palestine. 21:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Palestinian exodus. Serious and protracted disagreement over compatibility of sources with the policy on verifiability. --20:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Ukraine after the Russian Revolution. Survey. Should the article be named as "History of Ukraine (1917-1922)", or be kept under the current title? 21:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Please join the discussion at Portal talk:China. 04:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Should the parenthetical (Taiwan) be used along side Chinese Taipei in sports related pages. One side indicates that the use of Taiwan is not necessary and is against IOC usage. The other side contends that it is useful for clarification for many people don't know what Chinese Taipei refers to and that those supporting IOC usage are not consistant in that usage as it is not used for all IOC members (i.e. China, Laos, Iran) Please see Talk:2006 Asian Games#Request for Comments 07:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (settlements) - Survey on proposal to make U.S. city naming guidelines consistent with others countries, in particular Canada. 14:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Cheema - The article is biased against Hindu Jatts, with disruptive editors (currently blocked) making unverified statements and misrepresenting sources.Some Neutral observers are needed to clean up the article. Some knowledgable editors are also needed. 18:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Old Great Bulgaria — There are concerns that the title of the article results from ill-advised Romantic Nationalism. 12:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Deir Yassin massacre -- There is a disagreement as to whether the article should contain a statement by Emanuel Winston, and whether the occurrence should be described as an incident or a massacre. 06:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Tipu Sultan#Religious_Persecution The usual Hindu/Muslim thing. Some pretty nasty stuff is being alleged with (in my view) the purpose of whipping up religious tensions and inflaming hatred. I have tried to point out that much of the negative propaganda about Tipu stems from the work of British historians in the twenty years or so after the fall of Seringapatam, when they had a vested interest in painting as black a picture of Tipu as possible. I have been endeavouring to remove references to religious polemic and replace them with scholarly sources, whilst pointing out that the projection of a stark Hindu/Muslim divide into the past is anachronistic. I am not having much success. 09:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Assyrian people. Somewhat of an entrenched situation. Scope issues. It appears that the article is exposed to patriotic feelings of various natures, with people insisting on discussing Bronze Age history in the lead paragraph in order to "not disconnect" this contemporary ethnic group from its "ancient roots". Calm-headed input would be much appreciated. 21:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Armenia. There is a disagreement between various users about whether Armenia should be classed as a European or Asian country. As a compromise, it has been proposed to change this sentence Culturally, historically and politically Armenia is considered part of Europe to this sentence: Armenia is situated at a cultural, historical, and religious intersection and located at the crossroads between Europe and Asia, in the southern Caucasus. However, a number of users have strongly opposed this change and feel that the article should stay as it is. 09:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Category: