Revision as of 02:48, 7 November 2019 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Ed Miliband/Archive 3) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:24, 17 December 2020 edit undoNinetyone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,591 edits →"Public policy analyst": new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
] | ] | ||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Please participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]<sup>]</sup> 14:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC) | An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Please participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]<sup>]</sup> 14:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
== "Public policy analyst" == | |||
An IP editor, most recently at {{user|86.20.153.38}}, is repeatedly trying to amend the opening sentence to describe Miliband as "a politician '''and public policy analyst'''". As various users have suggested in their edit summaries, this is not a sensible addition. The main issue is that "public policy analyst" is not a trade or profession: a doctor who worked as a doctor and then became a politician might well be described as a "politician and a doctor", even if they didn't actively practice medicine any more, but "public policy analyst" is not a descriptor that holds any real meaning if one is also an elected politician. Secondly, there is no suggestion that Miliband is, at present, a "public policy analyst" \, or doing the work of one - he is a full-time politician. Thirdly, there are no reliable sources describing Miliband as a public policy analyst, for perhaps obvious reasons (the editor suggested that the article contains content that supports the assertion: the article does not include the word "analyst" anywhere). This text needs to stop being re-added unless and until it's addition can be justified - and the slow-time edit war needs to stop as well. ]:] 23:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:24, 17 December 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ed Miliband article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Ed Miliband has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
"Tom Baldwin (journalist)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tom Baldwin (journalist). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Tigraan 14:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
"Public policy analyst"
An IP editor, most recently at 86.20.153.38 (talk · contribs), is repeatedly trying to amend the opening sentence to describe Miliband as "a politician and public policy analyst". As various users have suggested in their edit summaries, this is not a sensible addition. The main issue is that "public policy analyst" is not a trade or profession: a doctor who worked as a doctor and then became a politician might well be described as a "politician and a doctor", even if they didn't actively practice medicine any more, but "public policy analyst" is not a descriptor that holds any real meaning if one is also an elected politician. Secondly, there is no suggestion that Miliband is, at present, a "public policy analyst" \, or doing the work of one - he is a full-time politician. Thirdly, there are no reliable sources describing Miliband as a public policy analyst, for perhaps obvious reasons (the editor suggested that the article contains content that supports the assertion: the article does not include the word "analyst" anywhere). This text needs to stop being re-added unless and until it's addition can be justified - and the slow-time edit war needs to stop as well. ninety:one 23:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford articles
- Low-importance University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- High-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class Yorkshire articles
- High-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- GA-Class organized labour articles
- Mid-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- GA-Class socialism articles
- High-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English