| Revision as of 09:53, 7 November 2019 editJude1313 (talk | contribs)134 edits →WP:Reliable sources← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:55, 7 November 2019 edit undoJude1313 (talk | contribs)134 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | ||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC) | If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == October 2019 == | |||
| ] Please stop adding ] content, as you did on ]. This violates ]. If you continue to do so, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> ] (]) 12:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == BIAS and SPIN in Section Allegations == | == BIAS and SPIN in Section Allegations == | ||
Revision as of 09:55, 7 November 2019
October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Charles Thomson (journalist). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
You are an MJ fan (as I can see from your Twitter account). You are accusing me of "disruptive edits" and "unconstructive edits" with absolutely zero basis. You are purposely removing my edits to avoid the full truth being shown. Are you going to delete everything that anyone writes that shows balance or can only MJ fans write their version of events? If so I will have to take this up with Misplaced Pages Jude1313 (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Charles Thomson (journalist). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Israell (talk) 17:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
BIAS and SPIN in Section Allegations
Excuse me? The whole statement is currently unsourced. The statement I added is from the illegal recording by Anthony Pellicano. You can hear Evan Chandler state what I added in a YT video titled "Proof that Evan Chandler was not trying to Extort Michael Jackson" by Prime Media and Evan is HEARD saying "I love him (Jordan) so much that I'm willing to destroy my own life to protect him" Why on earth have you removed it? At the moment the snippets shown are cherry picked to make Evan Chandler look like an extortionist (as Pellicano attempted (and failed) to do) and does not give the fair picture of the full recording. There is EXTREME MJ innocent BIAS and SPIN in this whole page Jude1313 (talk) 13:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Jude1313, I've added back the quote in question, but the full quote this time. (Chandler was not referring to Jackson. It was all about June Chandler Schwartz and Dave Schwartz.) Israell (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Israell You state FALSELY "Chandler was not referring to Jackson. It was all about June Chandler". Evan SPECIFICALLY refers to Michael Jackson in that call!!! Evan Chandler --->" "only goal is right now I have to do what I think is best for Jordy", "bottom line to me is, yes, June is harming him, & MICHAEL JACKSON is harming him. I can prove that & I will prove that" "I love him (JC) so much that I’m willing to destroy my own life to protect him." Why on earth do you think the conversation is not about MJ as well as June? Have you not read the full transcript? Jude1313 (talk) 02:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC))
BIAS and SPIN in Section Allegations
Well glad it has been added. I will add a source to the full transcribed tape so Wiki users can read it themselves and not some MJ fan/Pellicano version of events. It is still heavily BIASED Jude1313 (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
WP:Reliable sources
Jude1313, make sure you stick to WP:Reliable sources, not WP:Self-published sources. For example, the "Relections on the Dance" source you've used in the Evan Chandler article is not a WP:Reliable source. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Flyer22, yes it is very difficult as all the Michael Jackson pages are under tremdendous attack by Michael Jackson fans/MJ Estate paid writers adding bias and misinformation to the pages. I am simply here trying to add balance (I am an attorney). The full transcript of the Chandler/Schwartz tapes is critical as MJ fans constantly quote convict Anthony Pellicano's splicing of the tapes which was done to make Evan Chandler appear an extortionist - the full transcript shows otherwise. Pellicano himself has since told reporters MJ was worse than a pedophile. Pellicano only worked the Chandler case so he is saying clearly there was no extortion and Jordy's accusations of molestation were true. MJ fans continuously add Pellicano's splicing - it is TEDIOUS. Jude1313 (talk) 02:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- I WP:Indented your post. I know that "all the Michael Jackson pages are under tremdendous attack by Michael Jackson fans." See what I stated here and here on my talk page. I'm not sure if "MJ Estate paid writers" are involved. The point regarding my above post to you is that you still need to only use sources that pass the WP:Reliable sources guideline and that you need to stick to what the sources state. Do not editorialize. On Misplaced Pages, "balance" means following WP:Due weight; see WP:Due weight and its subsections. Please read and study the rules I've pointed you to. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Quite honestly, User:Jude1313, you come here to deface what User:Flyer 22 Reborn, myself, and others are attempting to balance ourselves. We don't agree on everything, but we do find some common ground. As stated, you have got to use credible sources. When one decides to move their tinfoil hat, they would conclude that if the big bad Michael Jackson Estate was paying editors to come to edit WP, things would be a lot rosier than they are. Let's take a look in the mirror before you start accusing people of getting paid to edit WP. You clearly said above that you have a youtube channel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NRowSJ6pSg&t=1s, one dedicated to proving, and fails at doing so, Jackson's guilt. The fact is that Jackson has an entire cult of pedophile fantasists who have dedicated their lives to convince others that he was guilty, recreating narratives that have no supporting facts or evidence in the process, and desires so badly that children have been abused even though due process was served. With unsubstantiated claims like "quote convict Anthony Pellicano's splicing of the tapes which was done to make Evan Chandler appear an extortionist - the full transcript shows otherwise," it's hard to tell you apart from the camp described above. Furthermore, you are wrong, the full transcript does not prove otherwise. It proves nothing. Extortion was on the table and will continue to be on the table. The Chandlers had a chance to prove otherwise, but they chose not to pursue a criminal trial when an opportunity for justice presented itself, TWICE and for a long period of time! TruthGuardians (talk) 04:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
TruthGuardians WOW DISGRACEFUL comments and you 100% prove my point!! Plus deliver AD HOMINEMS & LIES right there!!! Who on earth do you think you are? "you come here to deface what User:Flyer 22 Reborn, myself, and others". I BALANCE BIAS, remove UNTRUE & UNSOURCED STATEMENTS & MERE OPINION whomever the USER - in-line with WikiPedia poilcy. "You clearly said above that you have a youtube channel" I DO NOT HAVE a YouTube Chennel and have NEVER stated I have a YouTube Channel! THAT IS A LIE "The fact is that Jackson has an entire cult of pedophile fantasists" GOOD GRIEF You call people who defend MJ'S alleged victims PEDOPHILE FANTASISTS???????????????? HOW DARE YOU!! DO NOT CONTACT ME AGAIN IN SUCH A MANNER OR I WILL REPORT YOU FOR HARASSMENT.Jude1313 (talk) 09:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)