Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kinneyboy90: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:32, 7 December 2006 editKinneyboy90 (talk | contribs)4,745 edits Orphaned fair use image (Image:Revelations.jpg): put under heading, plz do this henceforth, it makes it easier for me to find your comment← Previous edit Revision as of 01:32, 7 December 2006 edit undoKinneyboy90 (talk | contribs)4,745 edits Re: Six-Day War: grammarNext edit →
Line 56: Line 56:
== Re: Six-Day War == == Re: Six-Day War ==


From what I understand having the sun at ones back is nearly always a tactical advantage. Even in a preemptive strike the sun would obscure the attacking planes from surface defenses and the like, particularly useful as many of the attacking aircraft flew bellow radar in range of optically targeted AA. In regards to the user who you personally know I would rather you not attack him on my talk page whether or not they "no anything" is not important. If you want to tweak the sentence be my guest. Thanks. ] 00:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC) From what I understand having the sun at one's back is nearly always a tactical advantage. Even in a preemptive strike the sun would obscure the attacking planes from surface defenses and the like, particularly useful as many of the attacking aircraft flew bellow radar in range of optically targeted AA. In regards to the user who you personally know I would rather you not attack him on my talk page whether or not they "know anything" is not important. If you want to tweak the sentence be my guest. Thanks. ] 00:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:32, 7 December 2006

I am currently: Online

User Page

Userboxes

Talk

Email

Desk

Archive
Archives
  1. 21 May 2005 – 09 February 2006
  2. 09 February 06 – 20 July 2006


Re: Deletion request

Hello, aero. I was archiving my talk page and accidentally left of the "90" in my username, resulting in this. Could you, perhaps, delete it for me? I moved it, and I'm sorry for my ignorance. But I make mistakes every now and then. Aaрон Кинни (t) 09:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello! I have deleted the redirect page, as you have requested. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  12:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Alexander II

Hi, could you please see my question at Talk:History of the Jews in Russia and the Soviet Union#Native Hebrew?? I believe the edit in question was yours. Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 23:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Category:Allegedly anti-Semitic people

They can't delete/rename the Category:Anti-Semitic people so they are trying another tactic !

Your vote is requested: . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.115.76 (talkcontribs)

Thank you, dear Aaron!

Thank you, dear Aaron! :) Your incredibly kind words mean a lot to me, and considering we've only had the chance to interact briefly so far, the fact that you remember me in such beautiful (and undeserved! ;) terms is flattering indeed. Don't think for a moment that I've forgotten your own desire to go for the mop in the near future, and I think you really deserve it, so I'll eagerly be waiting for this link to turn blue - you can count on a strong support from me! ;) Take good care! Hugs, Phaedriel The Wiki Soundtrack! - 22:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, thanks!

I'm sorry, it's been some time since I checked my LJ and I only just noticed your comment. I wish I could take credit for the subtitle, but I flagrantly ripped it off of Steve Jackson Games's brilliant black-humor conspiracy card game Illuminati: New World Order. One of the cards has that name, and features a pair of evil geniuses in the labcoated mad-scientist mold, grinning and posing as if for a PR photo. If only I were actually that clever. Kasreyn 05:15, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Aaronkinney.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aaronkinney.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ˉˉ╦╩ 02:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

User:131.173.252.9

From your previous experience of 131.173.252.9, could you please look at recent October edits, particularly Bombing of Guernica. If you need any assistance please let me know. - RoyBoy 23:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I wanted your opinion on those recent edits. If you think they are all vandalism, let me know and I'll handle it (reverting/warning/blocking) from there. - RoyBoy 00:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Greetings and salutations

Hi Aaron just was wanting help with these editing controls and page layout. See ya, divineruler 18

By the way, my user page is horrible: User:divineruler 18

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Revelations.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Revelations.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Misplaced Pages and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Oden 06:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Six-Day War

From what I understand having the sun at one's back is nearly always a tactical advantage. Even in a preemptive strike the sun would obscure the attacking planes from surface defenses and the like, particularly useful as many of the attacking aircraft flew bellow radar in range of optically targeted AA. In regards to the user who you personally know I would rather you not attack him on my talk page whether or not they "know anything" is not important. If you want to tweak the sentence be my guest. Thanks. Daniel J. Leivick 00:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)