| Revision as of 09:24, 3 December 2019 editAustronesier (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,101 edits →December 2019← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:42, 3 December 2019 edit undoUkrainianSavior1 (talk | contribs)147 edits →December 2019Next edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| On another note, I would like you to ] while interacting with other editors. Calling other editor's contributions "propaganda and vandalism" and titulating them as "Russian agents" does not help to create an environment for constructive editing. This also includes reporting other editors for vandalism, when they disagree with your point of view in an ongoing content dispute. –] (]) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC) | On another note, I would like you to ] while interacting with other editors. Calling other editor's contributions "propaganda and vandalism" and titulating them as "Russian agents" does not help to create an environment for constructive editing. This also includes reporting other editors for vandalism, when they disagree with your point of view in an ongoing content dispute. –] (]) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| Tell that to those that are actually reverting my edits and calling it "Vandalism" and "POV pushing". If you notice the edits before they arrived, most users agreed with the changes while also making a few adjustments of their own, with them reverting mine and everyone else's hard work "Just because it like this for years", which certainly isn't true, and can thus be surmised that they are trying to push an agenda, given the fact that the users are Russian and that many such users have made completely POV-based edits before on subjects pertaining to Ukraine. | |||
Revision as of 22:42, 3 December 2019
October 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Moscow; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 14:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep in mind that there was a missing citation on the matter, and the writing of that particular portion of the article did not point to it being established by then. Something to think about in terms of accuracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrainianSavior1 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Old East Slavic; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Austronesier (talk) 08:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
On another note, I would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Calling other editor's contributions "propaganda and vandalism" and titulating them as "Russian agents" does not help to create an environment for constructive editing. This also includes reporting other editors for vandalism, when they disagree with your point of view in an ongoing content dispute. –Austronesier (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Tell that to those that are actually reverting my edits and calling it "Vandalism" and "POV pushing". If you notice the edits before they arrived, most users agreed with the changes while also making a few adjustments of their own, with them reverting mine and everyone else's hard work "Just because it like this for years", which certainly isn't true, and can thus be surmised that they are trying to push an agenda, given the fact that the users are Russian and that many such users have made completely POV-based edits before on subjects pertaining to Ukraine.