Media bias in South Asia: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:06, 8 December 2006 editHkelkar (talk \| contribs)7,279 edits →Pakistan ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:36, 28 April 2007 edit undoJoseph20202021 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users97,222 editsm →Pakistan Next edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Pakistan==		==Pakistan==

	There is serious evidence of ethnic cleansing in Pakistan; the minority non-] population (], ], and ])has gone from 23% in 1947 to 2% in around fifty years. Internation rights groups, like the Center for Indic Studies at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, have accused the media of not informing the public about this issue.		There is serious evidence of ethnic cleansing in Pakistan; the minority non-] population (], ], and ]) has gone from 23% in 1947 to 2% in around fifty years. Internation rights groups, like the Center for Indic Studies at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, have accused the media of not informing the public about this issue .

	There are allegations by ] that the local media some times glosses over reports of persecution against the non-Islamic population in Pakistan.		There are allegations by ] that the local media some times glosses over reports of persecution against the non-Islamic population in Pakistan .

	==Sri Lanka==		==Sri Lanka==

Revision as of 08:36, 28 April 2007

Claims of Media bias in South Asia attract constant attention. The question of bias in South Asian media is also of great interest to people living outside of South Asia. Some accusations of media bias are motivated by a disinterested desire for truth, some are politically motivated. Media bias occurs in television, newspapers, school books and other media.

Bangladesh

Some right wing media outlets have been accused of having an anti-India and pro-Pakistan bias.

India

There have been claims that the history of the Islamic invasion of India is being systematically whitewashed and censored in Indian school-books and in other media (e.g. Shourie 1998). This was most common during the time the right wing BJP was in power.

Many media stations in India provided vast coverage of the Gujarat Riots in 2002 in which a large number of Muslims were murdered but have often failed to report on the persecution of Hindus in Muslim-dominated Jammu & Kashmir. There are also denials of the fact that Indians in general and Hindus in particular are being ethnically cleansed in Kashmir.

Recently, after the 11 July 2006 Mumbai train bombings, India banned some blogging webites(blogspot.com, typepad.com) as they were allegedly being used for terrorist communication. (17-7-2006) See how to bypass ban " http://my.opera.com/libertyfreedomtruth/blog/show.dml/362959 ". The ban was revoked after a week following a national outcry against it.

Pakistan

There is serious evidence of ethnic cleansing in Pakistan; the minority non-Islam population (Christians, Hindus, and Sikhs) has gone from 23% in 1947 to 2% in around fifty years. Internation rights groups, like the Center for Indic Studies at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, have accused the media of not informing the public about this issue .

There are allegations by Amnesty International that the local media some times glosses over reports of persecution against the non-Islamic population in Pakistan .

Sri Lanka

The government of Sri Lanka has been accused of controlling the media. Measures like the Public Security Ordinance and the Sixth Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitution have been accused of limiting a reporters freedom.

The Sixth Amendment to Sri Lanka's constitution, inserted as Article 157A, has been accused of threatening civic disability and seizing of property by banning promotion of separatism.

The Public Security Ordinance (PSO)law is often applied liberally when the government applies emergency regulations. This is quite often as Sri Lanka has been ruled under Emergency for a cumulative total of over 20 years since it gained independence from the British.

The Saturday Review, the English paper published in Jaffna and the Aththa, the Communist Sinhala language daily were banned in the early eighties under the PSO. When the Aththa was banned its press was also sealed. In the seventies, the government sealed the printing press of the Independent Newspapers Ltd. (Davasa Group) by using the emergency regulations.

Under the Emergency Regulations (E.R), all material relating to a subject specified in a gazetted presidential proclamation, has to be submitted for censoring by a 'competent authority.' The 'competent authority' is usually politically favoured civil servant. Recently, the regime made history by appointing a military officer as the government censor.

Material censored under such provisions has included comment on the high cost of living, on the dismissal of an employee of a state corporation, allegedly for an article he wrote for his trade union journal, on the marketing problems of passion fruit growers, criticism of a minister's statement in Parliament about a public corporation, and a reference to an alleged assault on two civilians .

Literature

Shourie, Arun: Eminent Historians: Their Technology, Their Line, Their Fraud. New Delhi, 1998.

Misplaced Pages