Misplaced Pages

Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:40, 8 December 2006 view sourceVeinor (talk | contribs)19,743 editsm Reverted edits by Mijorn to last version by Kendrick7← Previous edit Revision as of 23:56, 8 December 2006 view source Nishkid64 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users51,999 editsm -{{protect}}.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NPOV}}
#REDIRECT ]
{{current}}
{{Infobox Book
| name = Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
| image = ]
| image_caption = Cover showing the author, left, and protesters at the ], right
| author = ]
| illustrator =
| cover_artist = Michael Accordino
| country = United States of America
| language = English
| subject = Political Science
| publisher = ]
| release_date = ] ]
| media_type = Hardback
| pages = 264
| isbn = 978-0-7432-8502-5
| preceded_by = Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis
| followed_by =
}}

'''''Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid''''' is a controversial book written by ], former ] and winner of the 2002 ]. The book claims that ]’s current policies in the ] constitute “a system of ], with two peoples occupying the same land but completely separated from each other, with Israelis totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving ]s of their basic ].”<ref name="Siegel" />

==Criticism==
===Leading Democrats===

In particular, Democrats distanced themselves from the former ] President's book prior to the November ].

On ], ] Chairman ], and ] and soon-to-be ] ] stated that the book does not represent their views on Israel.

"While I have tremendous respect for former President Carter, I fundamentally disagree and do not support his analysis of Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," Dean's statement said, "On this issue President Carter speaks for himself, the opinions in his book are his own, they are not the views or position of the Democratic Party. I and other Democrats will continue to stand with Israel in its battle against terrorism and for a lasting peace with its neighbors."<ref name="Siegel">Siegel, Jennifer. ''Forward.com''. 27 October 2006. 3 December 2006</ref>

Pelosi wrote: "It is wrong to suggest that the ] would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that institutionalizes ethnically based oppression, and Democrats reject that allegation vigorously. With all due respect to former President Carter, he does not speak for the Democratic Party on Israel."<ref name="Siegel" />

]s ], ], ], and ] also released statements critical of the book. "I cannot agree with the book’s title and its implications about apartheid," Conyers wrote, "I recently called the former president to express my concerns about the title of the book, and to request that the title be changed.”<ref name="Siegel" /> Congressman Israel said, "The reason for the Palestinian plight is the Palestinians. Their leadership has no regard for the quality of life for their people and no capability of providing security or enforcing peace, and they have no one to blame but themselves.” He also added that the "book clearly does not reflect the direction of the party; it reflects the opinion of one man."<ref name="Siegel2">---. ''Forward.com''. 17 October 2006. 3 December 2006.</ref>

Aaron Miller, a former ] official who has consistently advocated a greater American role in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, said that Carter’s book would not influence key decision makers in the administration. But he added, "the one thing that I assure you is that Carter’s book will be read" by a wider audience.<ref name="Siegel2" />

===Other commentators===

], professor of law at ] and author of several books on the ], has pointed out a number of factual inaccuracies in Carter's book, including a claim that "Israel launche preemptive attacks on Egypt, Syria, Iraq and then Jordan"<ref>p. 5</ref> in the 1967 ]. As Dershowitz points out, "The fact is that Jordan attacked Israel first, Israel tried desperately to persuade Jordan to remain out of the war, and Israel counterattacked after the Jordanian army surrounded Jerusalem, firing missiles into the center of the city.<ref name="Dershowitz" /> Writing in the ] Dershowitz states: <blockquote>"<nowiki></nowiki> use of the loaded word 'apartheid,' suggesting an analogy to the hated policies of South Africa, is especially outrageous, considering his acknowledgment buried near the end of his shallow and superficial book that what is going on in Israel today 'is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land.... Mr. Carter's book is so filled with simple mistakes of fact and deliberate omissions that were it a brief filed in a court of law, it would be struck and its author sanctioned for misleading the court. Mr. Carter too is guilty of misleading the court of public opinion."<ref name="Dershowitz">{{cite web
|url=http://www.nysun.com/article/43958
|title=The World According to Carter
|last=Dershowitz
|first=Alan
|date=2006-11-22
|publisher=New York Sun
|accessdate=2 December
|accessyear=2006}}</ref></blockquote>
==See also==
* ]

==References==
<references/>

]
]
]
]
]
]

Revision as of 23:56, 8 December 2006

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Graphic of a globe with a red analog clockThis article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. Feel free to improve this article or discuss changes on the talk page, but please note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
Cover showing the author, left, and protesters at the Israeli West Bank barrier, right
AuthorJimmy Carter
Cover artistMichael Accordino
LanguageEnglish
SubjectPolitical Science
PublisherSimon & Schuster
Publication date14 November 2006
Publication placeUnited States of America
Media typeHardback
Pages264
ISBN978-0-7432-8502-5
Preceded byOur Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis 

Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid is a controversial book written by Jimmy Carter, former President of the United States and winner of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize. The book claims that Israel’s current policies in the Palestinian territories constitute “a system of apartheid, with two peoples occupying the same land but completely separated from each other, with Israelis totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving Palestinians of their basic human rights.”

Criticism

Leading Democrats

In particular, Democrats distanced themselves from the former Democratic President's book prior to the November 2006 mid-term election.

On 30 October, Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, and House Minority Leader and soon-to-be Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stated that the book does not represent their views on Israel.

"While I have tremendous respect for former President Carter, I fundamentally disagree and do not support his analysis of Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," Dean's statement said, "On this issue President Carter speaks for himself, the opinions in his book are his own, they are not the views or position of the Democratic Party. I and other Democrats will continue to stand with Israel in its battle against terrorism and for a lasting peace with its neighbors."

Pelosi wrote: "It is wrong to suggest that the Jewish people would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that institutionalizes ethnically based oppression, and Democrats reject that allegation vigorously. With all due respect to former President Carter, he does not speak for the Democratic Party on Israel."

U.S. Representatives Steve Israel, Charlie Rangel, Jerrold Nadler, and John Conyers, Jr. also released statements critical of the book. "I cannot agree with the book’s title and its implications about apartheid," Conyers wrote, "I recently called the former president to express my concerns about the title of the book, and to request that the title be changed.” Congressman Israel said, "The reason for the Palestinian plight is the Palestinians. Their leadership has no regard for the quality of life for their people and no capability of providing security or enforcing peace, and they have no one to blame but themselves.” He also added that the "book clearly does not reflect the direction of the party; it reflects the opinion of one man."

Aaron Miller, a former State Department official who has consistently advocated a greater American role in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, said that Carter’s book would not influence key decision makers in the administration. But he added, "the one thing that I assure you is that Carter’s book will be read" by a wider audience.

Other commentators

Alan Dershowitz, professor of law at Harvard University and author of several books on the Arab-Israeli conflict, has pointed out a number of factual inaccuracies in Carter's book, including a claim that "Israel launche preemptive attacks on Egypt, Syria, Iraq and then Jordan" in the 1967 Six-Day War. As Dershowitz points out, "The fact is that Jordan attacked Israel first, Israel tried desperately to persuade Jordan to remain out of the war, and Israel counterattacked after the Jordanian army surrounded Jerusalem, firing missiles into the center of the city. Writing in the New York Sun Dershowitz states:

" use of the loaded word 'apartheid,' suggesting an analogy to the hated policies of South Africa, is especially outrageous, considering his acknowledgment buried near the end of his shallow and superficial book that what is going on in Israel today 'is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land.... Mr. Carter's book is so filled with simple mistakes of fact and deliberate omissions that were it a brief filed in a court of law, it would be struck and its author sanctioned for misleading the court. Mr. Carter too is guilty of misleading the court of public opinion."

See also

References

  1. ^ Siegel, Jennifer. "Dems Repudiate Carter Book." Forward.com. 27 October 2006. 3 December 2006
  2. ^ ---. "Carter Book Slaps Israel With ‘Apartheid’ Tag, Provides Ammo to GOP." Forward.com. 17 October 2006. 3 December 2006.
  3. p. 5
  4. ^ Dershowitz, Alan (2006-11-22). "The World According to Carter". New York Sun. Retrieved 2 December. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
Categories: