| Revision as of 16:54, 9 December 2006 editJoshuaZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits →Please make sure your personal comments in edit summaries are focused on one person.: ok then← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:19, 12 December 2006 edit undoMathchem271828 (talk | contribs)201 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| I want to make it clear to any one who might browse my talk page that I had nothing to do with the current status of that page. I tried to put it back to where it was about the science and failed because other users wanted to make it about religion and ID, which obviously aren't science. | I want to make it clear to any one who might browse my talk page that I had nothing to do with the current status of that page. I tried to put it back to where it was about the science and failed because other users wanted to make it about religion and ID, which obviously aren't science. | ||
| :From the ]: biography, ''n.'' 2. A written record of the life of an individual. Not the "scientific life", not the "religious" life, not the "insert adjective here" life, but just the life. All of it. Period. ] 10:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Your eforts on the Schaefer page missed me as I was busy doing other things and anyway I am on the other side of the world and do things at different times. I was in the Schaefer group in 1990 on sabbatical and collaborated with him for several years after that. I think I have published 9 papers with him. I respect his science greatly and do not agree with him in any respect on religion. Please e-mail me from my user page and let us talk about him off wiki for a while. It is too late at night here now for more. --] 11:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | Your eforts on the Schaefer page missed me as I was busy doing other things and anyway I am on the other side of the world and do things at different times. I was in the Schaefer group in 1990 on sabbatical and collaborated with him for several years after that. I think I have published 9 papers with him. I respect his science greatly and do not agree with him in any respect on religion. Please e-mail me from my user page and let us talk about him off wiki for a while. It is too late at night here now for more. --] 11:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Please make sure your personal comments in edit summaries are focused on one person. == | |||
| Your edit, http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=William_A._Dembski&diff=next&oldid=93089195 with an edit summary of "(rv, agenda vandalism by Feloneous Monk)" removed not just stuff by FeloniousMonk but also reverted my conversion of a cite. This implies that I am working in ''concert'' with FeloniousMonk (which I can assure you is never the case). Please don't put personal comments into edit summaries unless you are very certain that all of which you are reverting is just targetted at that one person (and even then that's a dubious thing to say anyway but thats the other persons problem not mine). ] 14:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Also regarding that edit. While you might maybe have minimally plausible argument for your edit to the Schaefer page, the bottom line is that Demsbki has done nothing in the last 5 years at least other than promote ID and barely has any research to his credit. It would be appreciated if you would in the future not just engage in knee-jerk reactions as such. Furthermore, please try to ] and . Thanks. ] 16:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:19, 12 December 2006
Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Henry F. Schaefer, III
I want to make it clear to any one who might browse my talk page that I had nothing to do with the current status of that page. I tried to put it back to where it was about the science and failed because other users wanted to make it about religion and ID, which obviously aren't science.
Your eforts on the Schaefer page missed me as I was busy doing other things and anyway I am on the other side of the world and do things at different times. I was in the Schaefer group in 1990 on sabbatical and collaborated with him for several years after that. I think I have published 9 papers with him. I respect his science greatly and do not agree with him in any respect on religion. Please e-mail me from my user page and let us talk about him off wiki for a while. It is too late at night here now for more. --Bduke 11:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Category: