Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Flash Flash Revolution: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:09, 9 December 2006 editDeltopia (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users566 edits []: +info← Previous edit Revision as of 23:25, 9 December 2006 edit undoShii (talk | contribs)21,017 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
* '''Merge''' to new article ] with other articles such as ], ], ], ]. Failing that, '''redirect''' to ], which has a section on Simulators and clones, since the history doesn't need to be deleted from view. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—] <sup>(])</sup> <small>2006-12-09 18:58Z</small></i></span> * '''Merge''' to new article ] with other articles such as ], ], ], ]. Failing that, '''redirect''' to ], which has a section on Simulators and clones, since the history doesn't need to be deleted from view. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—] <sup>(])</sup> <small>2006-12-09 18:58Z</small></i></span>
* Normally I'm all in favor of deleting things as non-notable, but at this one I hesitate. It's been active for at least four years now (I think; seems like I've been playing it at least that long) and has a million logins (not users, but whatever). 1400 people are currently playing. (I am just throwing out stats that I see on the site right now.) It does not meet the cited notability threshholds, but perhaps we should consider ]? ] 21:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC) * Normally I'm all in favor of deleting things as non-notable, but at this one I hesitate. It's been active for at least four years now (I think; seems like I've been playing it at least that long) and has a million logins (not users, but whatever). 1400 people are currently playing. (I am just throwing out stats that I see on the site right now.) It does not meet the cited notability threshholds, but perhaps we should consider ]? ] 21:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
** I highly doubt those stats, and that's the problem with using primary sources. ]''']'''] <small>]</small> 23:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:25, 9 December 2006

Flash Flash Revolution

As Ashibaka said when he prodded it, there are no reliable sources. Nothing comes up in the Google news archive. No other reliable sources are listed in the article or can be found. --SPUI (T - C) 09:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)