| Revision as of 23:51, 9 December 2006 editREALiTY (talk | contribs)32 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:21, 10 December 2006 edit undoKjbd (talk | contribs)4 edits {{subst:delsort|Japan}} <small>-- ~~~~</small>Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ** I highly doubt those stats, and that's the problem with using primary sources. ]''']'''] <small>]</small> 23:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | ** I highly doubt those stats, and that's the problem with using primary sources. ]''']'''] <small>]</small> 23:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Redirect''' per Quarl. --] 23:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | * '''Redirect''' per Quarl. --] 23:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 06:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 06:21, 10 December 2006
Flash Flash Revolution
As Ashibaka said when he prodded it, there are no reliable sources. Nothing comes up in the Google news archive. No other reliable sources are listed in the article or can be found. --SPUI (T - C) 09:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete The article does not meet the notability requirements for either WP:WEB, WP:SOFTWARE, or WP:GAMES, whichever one is more applicable here. The article is also not verified (WP:V) by reliable source(s). --Limetom 12:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I doubt this Flash game is cited in any reputable source. Ashibaka tock 16:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to new article Dance Dance Revolution simulators and clones with other articles such as StepMania, Dance With Intensity, pydance, Text Text Revolution. Failing that, redirect to Dance Dance Revolution, which has a section on Simulators and clones, since the history doesn't need to be deleted from view. —Quarl 2006-12-09 18:58Z
- Normally I'm all in favor of deleting things as non-notable, but at this one I hesitate. It's been active for at least four years now (I think; seems like I've been playing it at least that long) and has a million logins (not users, but whatever). 1400 people are currently playing. (I am just throwing out stats that I see on the site right now.) It does not meet the cited notability threshholds, but perhaps we should consider ignoring all rules? Deltopia 21:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- I highly doubt those stats, and that's the problem with using primary sources. Ashibaka tock 23:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect per Quarl. --REALiTY 23:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Kjbd 06:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)