Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bergsoni: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:03, 26 December 2019 editIan Rose (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors78,159 edits Warning: Disruptive editing on Jules Massenet‎. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 16:19, 28 December 2019 edit undoTim riley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,099 edits Deceitful editing: new sectionNext edit →
Line 100: Line 100:
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 11:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC) If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 11:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

== Deceitful editing ==

I see that in addition to edit warring to peddle your own, unsubstantiated, ], you have also attempted to falsify a quotation in the article by censoring a part of it you didn't like. That is wholly unacceptable. Misplaced Pages expects its contributors to be honest and not to attempt to deceive people by falsifying cited material. The quotation reads, and will continue to read "It would be absurd to claim that he was anything more than a second-rate composer; he nevertheless deserves to be seen, like Richard Strauss, at least as a first-class second-rate one". You should be ashamed of your fraudulent conduct. If you continue, I shall seek a ban on your editing Misplaced Pages. '''<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">]]</span>''' 16:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:19, 28 December 2019

Hello, Bergsoni, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) 21:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

November 2016

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Political positions of Donald Trump. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 21:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notification for Political positions of Donald Trump and American Politics 2

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

FYI, Political positions of Donald Trump‎ is under active remedies which include a 1 revert per 24 hour limit. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please do not edit war at Jules Massenet. If you wish to persist with your proposed wording please discuss on the article talk page. Continued edit warring may lead to your being banned from editing Misplaced Pages. Tim riley talk 09:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Jules Massenet‎, you may be blocked from editing. Ian Rose (talk) 11:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Deceitful editing

I see that in addition to edit warring to peddle your own, unsubstantiated, point of view, you have also attempted to falsify a quotation in the article by censoring a part of it you didn't like. That is wholly unacceptable. Misplaced Pages expects its contributors to be honest and not to attempt to deceive people by falsifying cited material. The quotation reads, and will continue to read "It would be absurd to claim that he was anything more than a second-rate composer; he nevertheless deserves to be seen, like Richard Strauss, at least as a first-class second-rate one". You should be ashamed of your fraudulent conduct. If you continue, I shall seek a ban on your editing Misplaced Pages. Tim riley talk 16:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)