Misplaced Pages

Naomi Oreskes: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:19, 18 January 2020 editDadaNeem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users78,749 edits 7 wikilinks; refs work← Previous edit Revision as of 07:52, 18 January 2020 edit undoBruvuk (talk | contribs)120 editsm →Science and society essayNext edit →
Line 94: Line 94:
Oreskes wrote an essay on ] "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" in the journal '']'' in December 2004.<ref name="Oreskes_2004-12-03_Science" /><ref name="Oreskes_2005-01-21_sciencemag" /><ref name="search_on_sciencepolicy" /> Oreskes wrote an essay on ] "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" in the journal '']'' in December 2004.<ref name="Oreskes_2004-12-03_Science" /><ref name="Oreskes_2005-01-21_sciencemag" /><ref name="search_on_sciencepolicy" />


In the essay she reported an analysis of "928 abstracts, published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and published in the ] database with the keywords 'climate change'".<ref name="Oreskes_2004-12-03_Science" /> The essay stated the analysis was to test the hypothesis that the drafting of reports and statements by societies such as the ], ] and ] might downplay legitimate dissenting opinions on ]. After the analysis, she concluded that 75 percent of the examined ] either explicitly or implicitly backed the consensus view, while none directly dissented from it. The essay received a great deal of media attention from around the world and has been cited by many prominent persons such as ] in the movie '']''. In the essay she reported an analysis of "928 abstracts, published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and published in the ] database with the keywords 'global climate change'".<ref name="Oreskes_2004-12-03_Science" /> The essay stated the analysis was to test the hypothesis that the drafting of reports and statements by societies such as the ], ] and ] might downplay legitimate dissenting opinions on ]. After the analysis, she concluded that 75 percent of the examined ] either explicitly or implicitly backed the consensus view, while none directly dissented from it. The essay received a great deal of media attention from around the world and has been cited by many prominent persons such as ] in the movie '']''.


In 2007, Oreskes expanded her analysis, stating that approximately 20 percent of abstracts explicitly endorsed the consensus on climate change that: "Earth's climate is being affected by human activities". In addition, 55 percent of abstracts "implicitly" endorsed the consensus by engaging in research to characterize the ongoing and/or future impact of climate change (50 percent of abstracts) or to mitigate predicted changes (5 percent). The remaining 25 percent focused on either ] (10%) or developing measurement techniques (15%); Oreskes did not classify these as taking a position on contemporary global climate change.<ref>{{cite book |last=Oreskes |first=Naomi |authorlink=Naomi Oreskes |editor1-first=Joseph F. |editor1-last=DiMento |editor2-first=Pamela |editor2-last=Doughman |year=2007 |chapter=The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we’re not wrong? |chapterurl=http://www.ametsoc.org/atmospolicy/documents/Chapter4.pdf |title=Climate Change |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-262-04241-3 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/climatechangewha00dime }}</ref> In 2007, Oreskes expanded her analysis, stating that approximately 20 percent of abstracts explicitly endorsed the consensus on climate change that: "Earth's climate is being affected by human activities". In addition, 55 percent of abstracts "implicitly" endorsed the consensus by engaging in research to characterize the ongoing and/or future impact of climate change (50 percent of abstracts) or to mitigate predicted changes (5 percent). The remaining 25 percent focused on either ] (10%) or developing measurement techniques (15%); Oreskes did not classify these as taking a position on contemporary global climate change.<ref>{{cite book |last=Oreskes |first=Naomi |authorlink=Naomi Oreskes |editor1-first=Joseph F. |editor1-last=DiMento |editor2-first=Pamela |editor2-last=Doughman |year=2007 |chapter=The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we’re not wrong? |chapterurl=http://www.ametsoc.org/atmospolicy/documents/Chapter4.pdf |title=Climate Change |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-262-04241-3 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/climatechangewha00dime }}</ref>

Revision as of 07:52, 18 January 2020

Naomi Oreskes
Born (1958-11-25) November 25, 1958 (age 66)
Alma materImperial College, University of London
Stanford University
Scientific career
FieldsHistory of science, Economic geology
InstitutionsStanford University
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Dartmouth College
Harvard University
New York University
University of California, San Diego

Naomi Oreskes (born November 25, 1958) is an American historian of science. She became Professor of the History of Science and Affiliated Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Harvard University in 2013, after 15 years as Professor of History and Science Studies at the University of California, San Diego. She has worked on studies of geophysics, environmental issues such as global warming, and the history of science. In 2010, Oreskes co-authored Merchants of Doubt which identified some parallels between the climate change debate and earlier public controversies.

Background

Oreskes is the daughter of Susan Eileen (née Nagin), a teacher, and Irwin Oreskes, a professor of medical laboratory sciences and former dean of the School of Health Sciences at Hunter College in New York. She has three siblings: Michael Oreskes, a journalist; Daniel Oreskes, an actor; and Rebecca Oreskes, a writer and former U.S. Forest Service ranger.

She has worked as a consultant for the United States Environmental Protection Agency and US National Academy of Sciences, and has also taught at Dartmouth, NYU, UCSD and Harvard. She is the author of or has contributed to a number of essays and technical reports in economic geology and history of science in addition to several books.

Since 2017, Oreskes has been listed on the Board of Directors of the National Center for Science Education.

Oreskes is on the Board of Directors of the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund.

Academic career

Oreskes' academic career started in geology, then broadened into history and philosophy of science. Her work was concerned with scientific methods, model validation, consensus, dissent, as in 2 books on the often-misunderstood history of continental drift and plate tectonics. She later focused on climate change science and studied the doubt-creation industry opposing it.

She received her Bachelor of Science in mining geology from the Royal School of Mines of Imperial College, University of London in 1981. She then worked as a mining geologist for WMC (Western Mining Company) in outback South Australia, based in Adelaide, SA.

Starting in 1984, she returned to academe as a research assistant in the Geology Department and as a teaching assistant in the departments of Geology, Philosophy and Applied Earth Sciences at Stanford University. She received her PhD degree in the Graduate Special Program in Geological Research and History of Science at Stanford in 1990.

The 1992 Hitzman-Oreskes-Einaudi paper on Cu-U-Au-REE ("Olympic Dam") deposits has been cited more than 700 times, according to Google Scholar. She received a National Science Foundation's Young Investigator Award in 1994 .

During 1991-1996 she was Assistant Professor of Earth Sciences and Adjunct Asst. Professor of History Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. She spent 1996-1998 as Associate Professor, History and Philosophy of Science, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, New York University.

As an example of studying scientific methods, she wrote on model validation in the Earth sciences,, cited more than 3200 times according to Google Scholar.

She moved to University of California, San Diego in 1998 as Associate Professor, Department of History and Program in Science Studies , then as Professor in that department 2005-2013, as well as Adjunct Professor of Geosciences (from 2007). She was named Provost of the Sixth College 2008-2011.

In 1999 she participated as a consultant to the US Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board for developing a repository safety strategy for the Yucca Mountain project, with special attention to model validation.

Since 2013, Oreskes has served as a Professor at Harvard University in the Department of the History of Science and Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences (by courtesy).

Science and society essay

Oreskes wrote an essay on science and society "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" in the journal Science in December 2004.

In the essay she reported an analysis of "928 abstracts, published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and published in the ISI database with the keywords 'global climate change'". The essay stated the analysis was to test the hypothesis that the drafting of reports and statements by societies such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, American Association for the Advancement of Science and National Academy of Sciences might downplay legitimate dissenting opinions on anthropogenic climate change. After the analysis, she concluded that 75 percent of the examined abstracts either explicitly or implicitly backed the consensus view, while none directly dissented from it. The essay received a great deal of media attention from around the world and has been cited by many prominent persons such as Al Gore in the movie An Inconvenient Truth.

In 2007, Oreskes expanded her analysis, stating that approximately 20 percent of abstracts explicitly endorsed the consensus on climate change that: "Earth's climate is being affected by human activities". In addition, 55 percent of abstracts "implicitly" endorsed the consensus by engaging in research to characterize the ongoing and/or future impact of climate change (50 percent of abstracts) or to mitigate predicted changes (5 percent). The remaining 25 percent focused on either paleoclimate (10%) or developing measurement techniques (15%); Oreskes did not classify these as taking a position on contemporary global climate change.

Merchants of Doubt

Main articles: Merchants of Doubt and Merchants of Doubt (film)

Merchants of Doubt is a 2010 book by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. Oreskes and Conway, both American historians of science, identify some remarkable parallels between the climate change debate and earlier controversies over tobacco smoking, acid rain, and the hole in the ozone layer. They argue that spreading doubt and confusion was the basic strategy of those opposing action in each case. In particular, Fred Seitz, Fred Singer, and a few other contrarian scientists joined forces with conservative think tanks and private corporations to challenge the scientific consensus on many contemporary issues.

Most reviewers received it "enthusiastically". One reviewer said that Merchants of Doubt is exhaustively researched and documented and may be one of the most important books of 2010. Another reviewer saw the book as his choice for best science book of the year.

A film with the same name, inspired by the book, was released in 2015.

Controversies

Oreskes' 2004 "Beyond the Ivory Tower" essay was challenged by British social anthropologist Benny Peiser, who eventually retracted his challenge, admitting he had only found one paper rejecting anthropogenic climate change, published by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (see also Benny Peiser § Objections to Oreskes essay).

Together with Erik Conway and Matthew Shindell, in 2008, Oreskes wrote the paper "From Chicken Little to Dr. Pangloss: William Nierenberg, Global Warming, and the Social Deconstruction of Scientific Knowledge" which argued that William Nierenberg as chairman reframed a National Academy of Sciences committee report on climate change in 1983 into economic terms to avoid action on the topic. Nierenberg died in 2000 but a rebuttal was published in 2010 in the same journal which said the paper contradicted the historical report and there was no evidence that any committee members disagreed with the report; the evidence was that the report reflected the consensus at the time.

In 2015 Oreskes published an opinion piece in The Guardian, titled "There is a New Form of Climate Denialism to Look Out For – So Don't Celebrate Yet", in which she said scientists who call for a continued use of nuclear energy are renewable-energy "deniers" and "myth" makers. She cited an article by four prominent climate scientists saying nuclear power must be used to combat climate change. An opinion piece by Michael Specter in The New Yorker said she branded these four scientists as "climate deniers", and that her characterization was absurd, as they were among those who had done the most to push people to combat climate change.

In 2015 news outlets published stories about how ExxonMobil scientists had found evidence for climate change but the same company cast doubt on climate change, a conclusion echoed by Oreskes. The company criticized Oreskes and invited her and the public to read approximately 187 documents written between 1977 and 2014. She and Geoffrey Supran did so and supported the original stories in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Research Letters in 2017, as reported by the Washington Post.

Bibliography

Books

Important papers

Selected editorials and opinion articles

Selected awards, honors, and fellowships

Notes and references

  1. Oreskes, Naomi lccn.loc.gov. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  2. "People: Naomi Oreskes". Harvard University. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
  3. ^ Steketee, Mike (November 20, 2010). "Some sceptics make it a habit to be wrong". The Australian. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  4. New York Times: "Geraldine Baum, Reporter, Marries" September 24, 1989
  5. Phys.org: "Oreskes, professor at NYC's Hunter College, dies" by Meghan Barr March 2, 2013
  6. Who's who in the West: A Biographical Dictionary of Noteworthy Men and Women. A.N. Marquis Company. 2004. ISBN 978-0837909356. Retrieved April 19, 2015.
  7. ^ City University of New York: "Irwin Oreskes, Professor Emeritus at NYC’s Hunter College who Taught Lab Science Dies at 86" March 4, 2013 |"Besides Michael Oreskes, Irwin Oreskes also is survived by his wife, Susan Oreskes; his other children, Naomi Oreskes, a science historian, Daniel Oreskes, an actor, and Rebecca Oreskes, a writer and former ranger with the U.S. Forest Service, and five grandchildren. His funeral will be held on Sunday at Jewish Community Chapel"
  8. New York Times Obituary: "NAGIN—Morris, age 73, died after brief Illness on June 2, 1964" June 4, 1964 | "... devoted father of Susan Oreskes and the late Richard Nagin, loving grandfather of Iris Nagin, Michael, Daniel, Naomi and Rebecca Oreskes...Services at Riverside Memorial Chapel..."
  9. "Naomi Oreskes Is Wed To Dr. Kenneth Belitz". The New York Times. September 29, 1986. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 14, 2017.
  10. "Publications". UCSD. Archived from the original on February 4, 2012. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  11. "Board of Directors". ncse.com. National Center for Science Education. Archived from the original on October 7, 2017. Retrieved October 30, 2018.
  12. "Board of Directors". csldf.org. Climate Science Legal Defense Fund. Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  13. "Naomi Oreskes Is Wed To Dr. Kenneth Belitz". The New York Times. September 29, 1986.
  14. "Award Abstract #9357888 NSF Young Investigator". nsf.gov/awardsearch. December 8, 1993. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  15. "Naomi Oreskes C.V. 2003" (PDF). history.ucsd.edu. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  16. Oreskes, Naomi; Kristin Shrader-Frechette; Kenneth Belitz (1994). "Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences" (PDF). Science. 263 (5147): 641–646. Bibcode:1994Sci...263..641O. doi:10.1126/science.263.5147.641. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17747657. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  17. "Naomi Oreskes C.V. 2003" (PDF). history.ucsd.edu. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  18. "Oreskes appointed provost of UCSD's Sixth College". ww.sddt.com/News. February 7, 2008. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  19. US Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (September 14, 1999). "Developing a repository safety strategy with special attention to model validation" (PDF). US Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 1, 2013. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  20. "Naomi Oreskes". Harvard Faculty Directory. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
  21. ^ Oreskes, Naomi (December 3, 2004). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Science. 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594.
  22. Oreskes, Naomi (January 21, 2005). "Beyond the Ivory Tower, The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change (including corrections)" (PDF). Science. 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  23. Pielke, R. A.; Oreskes, N. (May 13, 2005). "Exchange of letters to Science" (PDF). Science. 308 (5724): 952–954. doi:10.1126/science.308.5724.952. PMID 15890861. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 12, 2010. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  24. Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we're not wrong?". In DiMento, Joseph F.; Doughman, Pamela (eds.). Climate Change. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-04241-3. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  25. Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway (2010). Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Press, p. 6.
  26. Rohr, Christian (2015). "Die Machiavellis der Wissenschaft. Das Netzwerk des Leugnens". Physik in Unserer Zeit. 46 (2): 100. doi:10.1002/piuz.201590021.
  27. McKie, Robin (August 8, 2010). "Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway". The Guardian. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  28. "The film that reveals how American 'experts' discredit climate scientists". The Guardian. March 15, 2015.
  29. Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik M.; Shindell, Matthew (Winter 2008). "From Chicken Little to Dr. Pangloss: William Nierenberg, Global Warming, and the Social Deconstruction of Scientific Knowledge". Hist Stud Nat Sci. 38 (1): 109–152. doi:10.1525/hsns.2008.38.1.109.
  30. Template:Cite article
  31. Gillis, Justin (June 15, 2015). "Naomi Oreskes, a Lightning Rod in a Changing Climate". New York Times. Profiles in Science.
  32. Oreskes, Naomi (December 16, 2015). "There is a new form of climate denialism to look out for – so don't celebrate yet". The Guardian.
  33. Hansen, James; Emanuel, Kerry; Caldeira, Ken; Wigley, Tom (December 3, 2015). "Nuclear power paves the only viable path forward on climate change". The Guardian.
  34. Specter, Michael (December 18, 2015). "How Not to Debate Nuclear Energy and Climate Change". The New Yorker.
  35. ^ Grandoni, Dino (August 24, 2017). "ExxonMobil asked people to 'read the documents' it produced on climate change. So these Harvard researchers did". The Washington Post.
  36. Stein, Daniel (October 1991). "Review: The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science by Naomi Oreskes". American Scientist.
  37. Coakley, Bernard (August 2002). "Review: Upheaval from the Abyss by David M. Lawrence and Plate Tectonics edited by Naomi Oreskes and Homer Le Grand". American Scientist.
  38. "The British Academy Medal". British Academy. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  39. "Mary C. Rabbit Award (History and Philosophy of Geology Division)". Geological Society of America. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  40. "Elected Members". American Philosophical Society. Retrieved May 17, 2019.
  41. "NAOMI ORESKES Fellow: Awarded 2018 Field of Study: History of Science, Technology and Economics". John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  42. "Members". American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  43. "Naomi Oreskes: Should Scientists Serve as Sentinels". American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  44. "2016 Stephen H. Schneider Award for Outstanding Climate Science Communication Bestowed Upon Dr. Naomi Oreskes". Climate One. July 12, 2016. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  45. "Johnson, Lozier, Meltzer, and Oreskes Receive 2016 Ambassador Awards". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  46. "Dr. Naomi Oreskes Receives 2016 Frederick Anderson Climate Change Award". Center for International Environmental Law. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  47. "Convocation and Guest Speaker". The Evergreen State College. February 10, 2017. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  48. "2015 Public Service Award Presented to Naomi Oreskes". Geological Society of America. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  49. "Ten Distinguished Scientists and Scholars Named Fellows of Committee for Skeptical Inquiry - CSI". www.csicop.org. Retrieved October 15, 2015.
  50. "Historian of science Naomi Oreskes to present Patten Lectures at IU Bloomington". Indiana University. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  51. "AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ANNOUNCES THE 2014 PRIZE WINNERS". American Historical Association. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  52. "Why I Am a Presentist" (PDF). History of Science Society. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  53. Buhrman, Joan (2014). "AGU Celebrates Leaders for Contributions to Policy and Public Awareness". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 95 (21). American Geophysical Union: 178. Bibcode:2014EOSTr..95..178B. doi:10.1002/2014EO210007.
  54. "Seven Commencement Ceremonies at UC Riverside; Our Students Tell the Story". University of California, Riverside. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  55. "Historian and Scientist Naomi Oreskes and the Alliance for Climate Education Named 2011 Climate Change Communicators of the Year". www.climatechangecommunication.org. George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  56. "PREVIOUS AWARDEES". Francis Bacon Award in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  57. "Annual UCSD Chancellor's Associates event fetes outstanding faculty members". university of california,san diego. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  58. ^ "The Scientific Consensus on Global Warming: How Do We Know We're Not Wrong?". Environmental Science Seminar Series. American Meteorological Society. June 20, 2007. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  59. "Historian Of Science, Naomi Oreskes, Presents AAAS Award Lecture on Topic of Proof and Consensus in Science" (Press release). University of California. February 11, 2004. Archived from the original on October 22, 2011. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  60. "Historian of Science Awarded 2002 American Philosophical Society Sabbatical Fellowship". History of Science Society. August 13, 2001. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  61. "Award Abstract #9357888 NSF Young Investigator". National Science Foundation. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  62. "Ritter Memorial Fellowship". Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Archived from the original on March 26, 2012. Retrieved March 14, 2012.
  63. "Waldemar Lindgren Award". Society of Economic Geologists. Retrieved March 14, 2012.

External links

Portals: Categories: