| Revision as of 21:05, 11 December 2006 editDocu (talk | contribs)97,802 editsm cm on redirecting | Revision as of 21:53, 11 December 2006 edit undoChriscf (talk | contribs)5,611 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Is there an event you would like to write about? Maybe I can assist you. Please start the article and I will look into it. -- User:Docu | Is there an event you would like to write about? Maybe I can assist you. Please start the article and I will look into it. -- User:Docu | ||
| :] and ] already say all there is to say about this. As I said, if there was any actual ''content'' in this article, I might see things differently. My problem is not with the existence of the article, it's with the existence of articles on far-future events ''right now''. Why do we ''need'' an article on the 2011 event ''right now''? ] <small>] </small> 21:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:53, 11 December 2006
Chriscf, what problem do you have with the article? It's not the only sports event in 2009 with an article.
Is there an event you would like to write about? Maybe I can assist you. Please start the article and I will look into it. -- User:Docu
- WP:NOT#CBALL and WP:INN already say all there is to say about this. As I said, if there was any actual content in this article, I might see things differently. My problem is not with the existence of the article, it's with the existence of articles on far-future events right now. Why do we need an article on the 2011 event right now? Chris cheese whine 21:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)