| Revision as of 01:45, 12 December 2006 editDocu (talk | contribs)97,802 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:29, 12 December 2006 edit undoChriscf (talk | contribs)5,611 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ::Would you go through ] and confirm which points you feel apply here? -- User:Docu | ::Would you go through ] and confirm which points you feel apply here? -- User:Docu | ||
| :::I refer the honorable member to the answer I gave some moments ago. ] <small>] </small> 02:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:29, 12 December 2006
Chriscf, what problem do you have with the article? It's not the only sports event in 2009 with an article.
Is there an event you would like to write about? Maybe I can assist you. Please start the article and I will look into it. -- User:Docu
- WP:NOT#CBALL and WP:INN already say all there is to say about this. As I said, if there was any actual content in this article, I might see things differently. My problem is not with the existence of the article, it's with the existence of articles on far-future events right now. Why do we need an article on the 2011 event right now? Chris cheese whine 21:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Would you go through WP:NOT#CBALL and confirm which points you feel apply here? -- User:Docu
- I refer the honorable member to the answer I gave some moments ago. Chris cheese whine 02:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Would you go through WP:NOT#CBALL and confirm which points you feel apply here? -- User:Docu