| Revision as of 06:07, 12 December 2006 editFrise (talk | contribs)498 edits Take the issue to ANI, where it's already being discussed.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:10, 29 January 2007 edit undoCleo123 (talk | contribs)1,494 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Frise, thanks for . I'd say it was correct on the basis of BLP alone, but if you add the editor's history of inserting unsourced attacks like that into articles, it makes perfect sense to remove it. Good job.--] ] 02:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | Frise, thanks for . I'd say it was correct on the basis of BLP alone, but if you add the editor's history of inserting unsourced attacks like that into articles, it makes perfect sense to remove it. Good job.--] ] 02:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Your comments are appreciated, thank you. ] 02:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | :Your comments are appreciated, thank you. ] 02:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Richard Simmons == | |||
| I noticed that you removed the entire Trivia section from the Richard Simmons article and I am curious as to your rationale. That is ALOT of material to arbitrarily remove from an article, particularly when it is not defamatory in nature. The material my not be footnoted, but based on the external links etc. it appears that the article is well researched. I was able to varify much of the Trivia information with a quick google check. Isn't there a tag that could be placed on the section until it can be footnoted? It seems kind of extreme to delete a whole sectiton. ] 23:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:10, 29 January 2007
Leave a message.
Thanks for removing
Frise, thanks for removing this unsourced statement. I'd say it was correct on the basis of BLP alone, but if you add the editor's history of inserting unsourced attacks like that into articles, it makes perfect sense to remove it. Good job.--Kchase T 02:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Your comments are appreciated, thank you. Frise 02:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Richard Simmons
I noticed that you removed the entire Trivia section from the Richard Simmons article and I am curious as to your rationale. That is ALOT of material to arbitrarily remove from an article, particularly when it is not defamatory in nature. The material my not be footnoted, but based on the external links etc. it appears that the article is well researched. I was able to varify much of the Trivia information with a quick google check. Isn't there a tag that could be placed on the section until it can be footnoted? It seems kind of extreme to delete a whole sectiton. Cleo123 23:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)